Sow and piglet productivity and sow reproductive performance in farrowing pens with temporary crating or farrowing crates on a commercial New Zealand pig farm

被引:42
作者
Chidgey, Kirsty L. [1 ]
Morel, Patrick C. H. [1 ]
Stafford, Kevin J. [1 ]
Barugh, Ian W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Inst Vet Anim & Biomed Sci, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
关键词
Farrowing crates; Combination pens; Piglets; Mortality; Sow performance; LACTATING SOWS; BIRTH-WEIGHT; MORTALITY; BEHAVIOR; ACCOMMODATION; SURVIVAL; PARTURITION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.003
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The use of a pen during lactation provides sows with more space so they can turn around freely. They are an alternative to the physically and behaviourally more restrictive farrowing crates. Previous studies have compared data from multiple pork production units using different farrowing accommodation types. This study was carried out on one commercial pig farm using two lactation systems. The objective was to examine the effect that the accommodation (pens with temporary crating until 4 days postpartum, or farrowing crates for the duration of lactation) had on the productivity of sows and piglets. Performance data was obtained from 394 sows (4706 live born piglets) in combination pens, and 338 sows (3987 live born piglets) in crates over 14 farrowing batches. Pre-weaning piglet mortality (PWM%) was significantly higher in the pen system (10.23%) than in the crate system (6.10%) (P<0.0001). Penned sows were released from the temporary crate on the fourth day of lactation. A greater proportion of piglets died in the combination pens (38.8%) than in the crates (30.43%) during the period extending from the fourth day of lactation until weaning (P<0.0001). Total pigs weaned per litter differed (P=0.0024) between pen (10.54 +/- 0.052) and crate systems (10.76 +/- 0.065). The accommodation in which a sow farrowed and lactated had no significant effect on subsequent reproductive performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 94
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]   A comparison of piglet production and survival in the Werribee Farrowing Pen and conventional farrowing crates at a commercial farm [J].
Cronin, GM ;
Lefébure, B ;
McClintock, S .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2000, 40 (01) :17-23
[12]   EFFECTS OF ACCOMMODATION TYPE AND STRAW BEDDING AROUND PARTURITION AND DURING LACTATION ON THE BEHAVIOR OF PRIMIPAROUS SOWS AND SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF PIGLETS TO WEANING [J].
CRONIN, GM ;
SMITH, JA .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1992, 33 (2-3) :191-208
[13]   Lying down and rolling behaviour in sows in relation to piglet crushing [J].
Damm, BI ;
Forkman, B ;
Pedersen, LJ .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2005, 90 (01) :3-20
[14]   Nest-building, behavioural disturbances and heart rate in farrowing sows kept in crates and Schmid pens [J].
Damm, BI ;
Lisborg, L ;
Vestergaard, KS ;
Vanicek, J .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (03) :175-187
[15]   CAUSES OF PIGLET DEATH FROM BIRTH TO WEANING [J].
DYCK, GW ;
SWIERSTRA, EE .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1987, 67 (02) :543-547
[16]  
Edwards S.A., 2008, P LOND SWIN C FAC NE
[17]   Higher preweaning mortality in free farrowing pens compared with farrowing crates in three commercial pig farms [J].
Hales, J. ;
Moustsen, V. A. ;
Nielsen, M. B. F. ;
Hansen, C. F. .
ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (01) :113-120
[18]   IMPROVING THE ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR OF STOCKPERSONS TOWARDS PIGS AND THE CONSEQUENCES ON THE BEHAVIOR AND REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL PIGS [J].
HEMSWORTH, PH ;
COLEMAN, GJ ;
BARNETT, JL .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1994, 39 (3-4) :349-362
[19]   Effects of parity, season and boar contact on the reproductive performance of weaned sows [J].
Hughes, PE .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1998, 54 (02) :151-157
[20]   A cohort study of preweaning piglet mortality and farrowing accommodation on 112 commercial pig farms in England [J].
KilBride, A. L. ;
Mendl, M. ;
Statham, P. ;
Held, S. ;
Harris, M. ;
Cooper, S. ;
Green, L. E. .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2012, 104 (3-4) :281-291