Task-based income inequalities and redistribution preferences: A comparison of China and Japan

被引:2
作者
Iida, Yoshio [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Sangyo Univ, Dept Econ, Kita Ku, Kyoto, Kyoto 6038555, Japan
关键词
Inequity aversion; Redistribution preferences; Experimental economics; Comparative study; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; FAIRNESS; PERFORMANCE; ALLOCATION; ABILITY; DISAPPOINTMENT; ENTITLEMENTS; MOTIVATION; WEIGHT; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2015.02.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To clarify whether a difference exists in the redistribution preferences of Japan and China and to provide insights into the possible causes of this difference, this study conducts an experiment similar to a dictator game but in which both donors and recipients have the chance to redistribute the initial incomes. In the experiment, an initial income gap is caused by one of two kinds of tasks that the subjects performed. One task requires subjects' innate abilities for better performance, and the other requires simple efforts. This study also explores the effect of subjectively recognized reasons for income gaps on these preferences. The experimental results show the following: (1) Chinese donors are more generous than Japanese donors; (2) both Chinese and Japanese recipients are similarly greedy; (3) the causes of the income gap and subjective recognitions regarding this gap do not affect the redistribution preferences; (4) males are less generous than females in Japan but not in China; and, (5) Japanese donors become more generous when they did not expect to win the higher initial income. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 102
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Reference Points and Effort Provision [J].
Abeler, Johannes ;
Falk, Armin ;
Goette, Lorenz ;
Huffman, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (02) :470-492
[2]   Conceptions of self and performance-related feedback in the US, Japan and China [J].
Bailey, JR ;
Chen, CC .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 1997, 28 (03) :605-625
[3]   Let's get personal: An international examination of the influence of communication, culture and social distance on other regarding preferences [J].
Buchan, Nancy R. ;
Johnson, Eric J. ;
Croson, Rachel T. A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2006, 60 (03) :373-398
[4]   Swift neighbors and persistent strangers: A cross-cultural investigation of trust and reciprocity in social exchange [J].
Buchan, NR ;
Croson, RTA ;
Dawes, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2002, 108 (01) :168-206
[5]  
Burrows P., 1994, EMPIR ECON, V19, P21
[6]   RESPONSE STYLE AND CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISONS OF RATING-SCALES AMONG EAST-ASIAN AND NORTH-AMERICAN STUDENTS [J].
CHEN, C ;
LEE, SY ;
STEVENSON, HW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 6 (03) :170-175
[7]   Hardnose the dictator [J].
Cherry, TL ;
Frykblom, P ;
Shogren, JF .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (04) :1218-1221
[8]   PREFERENCES FOR REDISTRIBUTION AND PERCEPTION OF FAIRNESS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY [J].
Durante, Ruben ;
Putterman, Louis ;
van der Weele, Joel .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2014, 12 (04) :1059-1086
[9]  
Fehr E, 2004, ROUNDTABLE SER BEHAV, P271
[10]   z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments [J].
Fischbacher, Urs .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 10 (02) :171-178