Provider variability in the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

被引:12
作者
Althoff, Friederike C. [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xinling [1 ,2 ]
Wachtendorf, Luca J. [1 ,2 ]
Shay, Denys [1 ,2 ]
Patrocinio, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Schaefer, Maximilian S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Houle, Timothy T. [2 ,4 ]
Fassbender, Philipp [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Eikermann, Matthias [1 ,2 ,6 ,7 ]
Wongtangman, Karuna [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Duesseldorf Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA USA
[5] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Univ Klinikum, Klin Anasthesiol Operat Intensivmed Schmerz & Pal, Marien Hosp Herne, Bochum, Germany
[6] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[7] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[8] MahidolUniv, Siriraj Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
adult anaesthesia; neuromuscular disease; health & safety; clinical pharmacology; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; ASSOCIATION; BLOCKADE; RISK;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048509
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo assess variability in the intraoperative use of non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) across individual anaesthesia providers, surgeons and hospitals.DesignRetrospective observational cohort study.SettingTwo major tertiary referral centres, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.Participants265537 adult participants undergoing non-cardiac surgery between October 2005 and September 2017.Main outcome measuresWe analysed the variances in NMBA use across 958 anaesthesia and 623 surgical providers, across anaesthesia provider types (anaesthesia residents, certified registered nurse anaesthetists, attendings) and across hospitals using multivariable-adjusted mixed effects logistic regression. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were calculated to further quantify the variability in NMBA use that was unexplained by other covariates. Procedure-specific subgroup analyses were performed.ResultsNMBAs were used in 183242 (69%) surgical cases. Variances in NMBA use were significantly higher among individual surgeons than among anaesthesia providers (variance 1.32 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.60) vs 0.24 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.28), p<0.001). Procedure-specific subgroup analysis of hernia repairs, spine surgeries and mastectomies confirmed our findings: the total variance in NMBA use that was unexplained by the covariate model was higher for surgeons versus anaesthesia providers (ICC 37.0% vs 13.0%, 69.7% vs 25.5%, 69.8% vs 19.5%, respectively; p<0.001). Variances in NMBA use were also partially explained by the anaesthesia provider's hospital network (Massachusetts General Hospital: variance 0.35 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.43) vs Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: 0.15 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.19); p<0.001). Across provider types, surgeons showed the highest variance, and anaesthesia residents showed the lowest variance in NMBA use.ConclusionsThere is wide variability across individual surgeons and anaesthesia providers and institutions in the use of NMBAs, which could not sufficiently be explained by a large number of patient-related and procedure-related characteristics, but may instead be driven by preference. Surgeons may have a stronger influence on a key aspect of anaesthesia management than anticipated.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Control of perioperative muscle strength during ambulatory surgery [J].
Alfille, Paul H. ;
Merritt, Christopher ;
Chamberlin, Nancy L. ;
Eikermann, Matthias .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 22 (06) :730-737
[2]   Effects of night surgery on postoperative mortality and morbidity: a multicentre cohort study [J].
Althoff, Friederike C. ;
Wachtendorf, Luca J. ;
Rostin, Paul ;
Santer, Peter ;
Schaefer, Maximilian S. ;
Xu, Xinling ;
Grabitz, Stephanie D. ;
Chitilian, Hovig ;
Houle, Timothy T. ;
Brat, Gabriel A. ;
Akeju, Oluwaseun ;
Eikermann, Matthias .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2021, 30 (08) :678-688
[3]   Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Davidson, D. J. ;
Bates, D. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) :390-412
[4]   Postoperative residual neuromuscular block: a survey of management [J].
Baillard, C ;
Clec'h, C ;
Catineau, J ;
Salhi, F ;
Gehan, G ;
Cupa, M ;
Samama, CM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (05) :622-626
[5]   Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications - A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium [J].
Berg, H ;
VibyMogensen, J ;
Roed, J ;
Mortensen, CR ;
Engbaek, J ;
Skovgaard, LT ;
Krintel, JJ .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 41 (09) :1095-1103
[6]  
Boon Martijn, 2018, F1000Res, V7, P167, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.13169.1
[7]  
Dexter F., 2011, ANESTH ANALG, V113
[8]   Deep neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions during gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity A randomised controlled trial [J].
Fuchs-Buder, Thomas ;
Schmartz, Denis ;
Baumann, Cedric ;
Hilt, Ludovic ;
Nomine-Criqui, Claire ;
Meistelman, Claude ;
Brunaud, Laurent .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (07) :486-493
[9]   The Effects of Postoperative Residual Neuromuscular Blockade on Hospital Costs and Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Population-Based Cohort Study [J].
Grabitz, Stephanie D. ;
Rajaratnam, Nishan ;
Chhagani, Khushi ;
Thevathasan, Tharusan ;
Teja, Bijan J. ;
Deng, Hao ;
Eikermann, Matthias ;
Kelly, Barry J. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 128 (06) :1129-1136
[10]   MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package [J].
Hadfield, Jarrod D. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2010, 33 (02) :1-22