Stepped care treatment for depression and anxiety in primary care. a randomized controlled trial

被引:57
作者
Seekles, Wike [1 ,4 ]
van Straten, Annemieke [1 ,4 ]
Beekman, Aartjan [2 ,4 ]
van Marwijk, Harm [3 ,4 ]
Cuijpers, Pim [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth Care & Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
MENTAL-HEALTH SURVEY; MAJOR DEPRESSION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; DISORDERS; METAANALYSIS; POPULATION; MANAGEMENT; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-12-171
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Depressive and anxiety disorders are common in general practice but not always treated adequately. Introducing stepped care might improve this. In this randomized trial we examined the effectiveness of such a stepped care model. Methods: The study population consisted of primary care attendees aged 18-65 years with minor or major DSM-IV depressive and/or anxiety disorders, recruited through screening. We randomized 120 patients to either stepped care or care as usual. The stepped care program consisted of (1) watchful waiting, (2) guided self-help, (3) short face-to-face Problem Solving Treatment and (4) pharmacotherapy and/or specialized mental health care. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 8, 16 and 24 weeks. Results: Symptoms of depression and anxiety decreased significantly over time for both groups. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (IDS: P = 0.35 and HADS: P = 0.64). The largest, but not significant, effect (d = -0.21) was found for anxiety on T3. In both groups approximately 48% of the patients were recovered from their DSM-IV diagnosis at the final 6 months assessment. Conclusions: In summary we could not demonstrate that stepped care for depression and anxiety in general practice was more effective than care as usual. Possible reasons are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Andersson Gerhard, 2009, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, V38, P196, DOI 10.1080/16506070903318960
[2]   Utilising survey data to inform public policy: Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of ten mental disorders [J].
Andrews, G ;
Issakidis, C ;
Sanderson, K ;
Corry, J ;
Lapsley, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 184 :526-533
[3]   Randomised controlled trials in psychiatry: important but poorly accepted [J].
Andrews, G .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7209) :562-564
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI). Version 1.0.
[5]  
[Anonymous], NICE CLIN GUID
[6]  
[Anonymous], NICE CLIN GUID
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, V4th
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NICE CLIN GUID, V90
[9]   Treating depression in primary care in low-income women in Santiago, Chile: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Araya, R ;
Rojas, G ;
Fritsch, R ;
Gaete, J ;
Rojas, M ;
Simon, G ;
Peters, TJ .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9362) :995-1000
[10]  
Babor T., 1989, ALCOHOL USE DISORDER