Comparative prospective randomized trial: laparoscopic versus open common bile duct exploration

被引:1
作者
Grubnik, Vladimir [1 ]
Tkachenko, Aleksandr [1 ]
Vorotyntseva, Ksenia [1 ]
机构
[1] State Med Univ, Clin Hosp, Dept Surg, Odessa, Ukraine
关键词
common bile duct; common bile duct (CBD) exploration; choledochotomy; transcystic duct extraction (TCDE); STONES;
D O I
10.5114/wiitm.2011.23214
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Single-stage laparoscopic procedures for common bile duct (CBD) stones are an alternative treatment option to two-stage endo-laparoscopic treatment and to open choledocholithotomy. Several reports have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, efficiency and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic techniques. Aim: To analyse the safety and benefits of laparoscopic compared to open common bile duct (CBD) exploration. Material and methods: The prospective randomized trial included a total of 256 patients with CBD stones operated from 2005 to 2009 in a single centre. The male/female ratio was 82/174, with a median age 62.3 +/- 5.8 years (range 27 to 87 years). There were two groups of patients. Group laparoscopic CBD exploration (138 patients). Group open CBD exploration (118 patients). Patient comorbidity was assessed by means of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification; ASA II - 109 patients, ASA III - 59 patients. Bile duct stones were visualized preoperatively by means of US examination in 129 patients, by means of ERCP in 26 patients, and by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in 72 patients. Preoperative evaluation was done through medical history, biochemical tests and ultrasonography. Results: The mean duration of laparoscopic procedures was 82 min (range 40-160 min). The mean duration of open procedures was 90 min (range 60-150 min). Mean blood loss was much lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (20 +/- 2 vs 285 +/- 27), p < 0.01. Postoperative complications were observed in 7 patients of the laparoscopic group and in 15 patients in the open group (p < 0.01). Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration was performed through a trans-cystic approach in 76 patients and via choledochotomy in 62 patients. The transcystic approach was successful in 76 patients (74.5%). External drainage was used in 25 (32.8%) patients with the transcystic approach. Conclusions: Laparoscopic CBD exploration can be performed with high efficiency, and minimal morbidity and mortality Laparoscopic procedures have advantages over open ones in terms of postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 91
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus T-tube [J].
Dong, Zhi-Tao ;
Wu, Guo-Zhong ;
Luo, Kun-lun ;
Li, Jie-Ming .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 189 (02) :249-254
[22]   Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study [J].
Koc, Bora ;
Karahan, Servet ;
Adas, Gokhan ;
Tutal, Firat ;
Guven, Hakan ;
Ozsoy, Ayhan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 206 (04) :457-463
[23]   Meta-analysis of laparoscopic transcystic versus transcholedochal common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis [J].
Bekheit, M. ;
Smith, R. ;
Ramsay, G. ;
Soggiu, F. ;
Ghazanfar, M. ;
Ahmed, I. .
BJS OPEN, 2019, 3 (03) :242-251
[24]   Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with a history of prior biliary surgery: a comparative study with an open approach [J].
Zhu, Jisheng ;
Du, Peng ;
He, Jianpeng ;
Tong, Fengxiong ;
Xiao, Weidong ;
Li, Yong .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (03) :E98-E103
[25]   Preliminary experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration [J].
Salama, Asaad F. ;
Abd Ellatif, Mohamed E. ;
Abd Elaziz, Hesham ;
Magdy, Alaa ;
Rizk, Hisham ;
Basheer, Magdy ;
Jamal, Wisam ;
Dawoud, Ibrahim ;
El Nakeeb, Ayman .
BMC SURGERY, 2017, 17
[26]   An auspicious experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration [J].
ElGhamry, ElGhamry E. ;
ElSheikh, Mohamed ;
Abdelhady, Hamdy ;
Hablus, Mohamed A. ;
Abdelhamid, Amir F. ;
Soliman, Hosam ;
Nassar, Ahmad .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 38 (03) :459-470
[27]   Evaluation of the Common bile duct (CBD) Diameter After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) and Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE): A Retrospective Study [J].
Pallaneeandee, Nayagan Kavidassen ;
Govindan, Shankara Subramanyam ;
Jun, Liu Zi .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (01) :62-68
[28]   Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis [J].
Qin, Ancheng ;
Wu, Jianwu ;
Qiao, Zhiming ;
Zhai, Min ;
Lu, Yijie ;
Huang, Bo ;
Jiang, Xinwei ;
Lu, Xingsheng .
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 :9770-9775
[29]   Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Common Bile Duct Exploration: Analysis of the NSQIP Database [J].
Halawani, Hamzeh M. ;
Tamim, Hani ;
Khalifeh, Farah ;
Mailhac, Aurelie ;
Taher, Ali ;
Hoballah, Jamal ;
Jamali, Faek R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 224 (05) :833-+
[30]   Randomized clinical trial of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus laparoscopic bile duct exploration in patients with choledocholithiasis [J].
Poh, B. R. ;
Ho, S. P. S. ;
Sritharan, M. ;
Yeong, C. C. ;
Swan, M. P. ;
Devonshire, D. A. ;
Cashin, P. A. ;
Croagh, D. G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (09) :1117-1124