Diagnostic accuracy of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:46
作者
Huang, Yuan-Lan [1 ]
Chan, Jie [2 ]
Yan, Wei [1 ]
Zang, Ding [1 ]
Qin, Qin [3 ]
Deng, An-Mei [3 ]
机构
[1] 455 Hosp PLA, Dept Lab Med, Shanghai 200052, Peoples R China
[2] Changhai Hosp, Dept Hematol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[3] Second Mil Med Univ, Changhai Hosp, Dept Lab Diag, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
Meta-analysis; Cytokeratin-19; fragment; Bladder cancer; Sensitivity; Specificity; URINARY-BLADDER; BIAS; SENSITIVITY; MARKERS; VALUES; TPA; ANTIGEN; NMP22; TESTS; SERUM;
D O I
10.1007/s13277-015-3352-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Previous studies have evaluated the accuracy of serum and urinary measurements of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) for the diagnosis of bladder cancer; however, the results have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall accuracy of CYFRA 21-1 for the diagnosis of bladder cancer. We performed a search for English-language publications reporting on the detection of CYFRA21-1 levels for the diagnosis of bladder cancer through November 2, 2014, using public medical databases, including EMBASE, Web of Science, and Medline. The quality of the studies was assessed by revised QUADAS tools. The performance characteristics were pooled and analyzed using a bivariate model. Publication bias was explored with the Deek's test. Sixteen studies, with a total 1,262 bladder-cancer patients and 1,233 non-bladder-cancer patients, were included in the study. The pooled sensitivities for serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 were 0.42 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.51) and 0.82 (95 % CI, 0.70-0.90), respectively. The corresponding specificities were 0.94 (95 % CI, 0.90-0.96) and 0.80 (95 % CI, 0.73-0.86), respectively. The areas under the summary receiver-operating-characteristic curves for serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 were 0.88 (95 % CI, 0.85-0.91) and 0.87 (95 % CI, 0.84-0.90), respectively. The major design deficiencies of the included studies were participant-selection bias, potential review, and verification bias. Therefore, we concluded that both serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 served as efficient indexes for bladder-cancer diagnosis. Additional, well-designed studies should be performed to rigorously evaluate the diagnostic value of CYFRA 21-1 for bladder cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:3137 / 3145
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Bladder cancer biomarkers: current developments and future implementation [J].
Alvarez, Alonso ;
Lokeshwar, Vinata B. .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2007, 17 (05) :341-346
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMPUTATIONAL GRAPHI
[3]   Bladder cancer [J].
Borden, LS ;
Clark, PE ;
Hall, MC .
CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2003, 15 (03) :227-233
[4]   The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW ;
Lijmer, JG .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) :7-18
[5]   Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Urothelial Bladder Cancer [J].
Burger, Maximilian ;
Catto, James W. F. ;
Dalbagni, Guido ;
Grossman, H. Barton ;
Herr, Harry ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre ;
Kassouf, Wassim ;
Kiemeney, Lambertus A. ;
La Vecchia, Carlo ;
Shariat, Shahrokh ;
Lotan, Yair .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (02) :234-241
[6]   Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer [J].
Cheung, Grace ;
Sahai, Arun ;
Billia, Michele ;
Dasgupta, Prokar ;
Khan, Muhammad S. .
BMC MEDICINE, 2013, 11
[7]   Meta-analyses of diagnostic studies [J].
Cleophas, Ton J. ;
Zwinderman, Aeilko H. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 47 (11) :1351-1354
[8]  
Correale M., 1994, International Journal of Biological Markers, V9, P231
[9]   The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed [J].
Deeks, JJ ;
Macaskill, P ;
Irwig, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (09) :882-893
[10]   Urinary markers of bladder carcinoma [J].
Dey, P .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2004, 340 (1-2) :57-65