The impact of emerging standards adoption on automated quality reporting

被引:6
作者
Fu, Paul C., Jr. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rosenthal, Daniel [5 ]
Pevnick, Joshua M. [3 ,6 ]
Eisenberg, Floyd [7 ]
机构
[1] Los Angeles Biomed Res Inst, Torrance, CA 90502 USA
[2] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Torrance, CA 90509 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Inova Hlth Syst, Falls Church, VA USA
[6] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[7] Natl Qual Forum, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Automated quality reporting; Quality measures; Standards; Semantic interoperability; OF-CARE; IMPROVE HEALTH; MEDICAL-CARE; INFORMATION; BREAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbi.2012.06.002
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Current quality measurement processes are labor-intensive, involving manual chart reviews and use of paper-based quality measures that vary in format and definitions from measure to measure. Automated quality reporting is considered by many to be an important tool that will help close the gaps in the quality of US health by increasing the timeliness, effectiveness, and use of quality assessment. In 2007, the US Department of Health and Human Services Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) funded three Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) health information exchanges (HIE) to demonstrate the feasibility of automated quality reporting by using existing or emerging standards to aggregate information from multiple providers, transmit patient-level quality data in standardized formats, perform an automated quality assessment, and generate a quality report document for electronic transmission. Long Beach Network for Health (LBNH), a NHIN Cooperative HIE, developed a web-based, real-time quality assessment service that calculates quality of care measure using clinical data aggregated through a HIE. LBNH used a set of draft standards to demonstrate automated quality reporting, but noted three important recommendations for future work. First, greater coordination is needed around initiatives that address the gaps in electronic quality measurement standards and processes, including strong Federal involvement and guidance. Second, a harmonized, evergreen quality use case is needed to provide stakeholders with a common understanding on the constantly evolving approaches towards automated quality measurement and reporting. Finally, there needs to be substantial investment in building on existing work and developing a comprehensive set of data and messaging standards to preserve semantic interoperability of quality measure data. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 781
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Adolph S., 2003, PATTERNS EFFECTIVE U
[2]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, DAT SOURC NAT COMM Q
[3]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, CAHPS PROGR
[4]  
Alliance for Pediatric Quality, 2007, QUAL REP DOC ARCH QR
[5]  
[Anonymous], NAT QUAL MEAS CLEAR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, MEDICARE STRATEGY QU
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PARTN HLTH SOL CHRON
[8]   Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample [J].
Asch, SM ;
McGlynn, EA ;
Hogan, MM ;
Hayward, RA ;
Shekelle, P ;
Rubenstein, L ;
Keesey, J ;
Adams, J ;
Kerr, EA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (12) :938-945
[9]   Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? [J].
Asch, SM ;
Kerr, EA ;
Keesey, J ;
Adams, JL ;
Setodji, CM ;
Malik, S ;
McGlynn, EA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (11) :1147-1156
[10]   The urgent need to improve health care quality - Institute of medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality [J].
Chassin, MR ;
Galvin, RW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :1000-1005