Effect of lung inhomogeneity on dose distribution during radiotherapy of patient with lung cancer

被引:0
作者
Zabihzadeh, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ghahremani, Z. [2 ]
Hoseini, S. M. [3 ]
Shahbazian, H. [3 ]
Ghahfarokhi, M. Hoseini [4 ]
机构
[1] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Canc Res Ctr, Ahvaz, Iran
[2] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Ahvaz, Iran
[3] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Golestan Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Ahvaz, Iran
[4] Kermanshah Univ Med Sci, Radiol & Nucl Med, Kermanshah, Iran
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH | 2020年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词
Electronic disequilibrium; lung cancer radiotherapy; Monte Carlo simulation; inhomogeneity correction factor; MONTE-CARLO EVALUATION; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; HETEROGENEOUS PHANTOMS; BEAM; ALGORITHMS; ACCURACY; IMRT;
D O I
10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.18.3.579
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Presence of inhomogeneities such as lung tissue with low density can perturbs the dose distribution in the path of therapeutic photon beam and causes undesired cold or hot spots. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lung tissue inhomogeneities on dose distribution in thorax irradiation. Materials and Methods: The Monte Carlo simulation (MC) code of EGSnrc-based BEAMnrc was used to calculate dose distribution for 6 MV- Siemens Primus linear accelerator (Linac) in a homogenous phantom. Dose perturbation and inhomogeneity corrected factors (ICFs) were calculated due to implementation of lung tissue depended to the lung density and field size. Results: The maximum increased dose in lung tissue with lung density of 0.5 and 0.25gr/cm(3) was 15.9%, 16.2%, 15.6%, 23.8 %, 24.8% and 25.0% for 6 x 6, 10 x 10 and 20 x 20 cm(2) field sizes, respectively. The maximum ICF for these field sizes was 1.16 and 1.25 for lung density of 0.5 and 0.25gr/cm(3), respectively. The maximum dose reduction in lung tissue with density of 0.25 and 0.5gr/cm(3) was 19.5% and 4.2 %, and the related ICF was estimated 0.84 and 0.95, respectively. Conclusion: Involvement of lung tissue in the path of irradiation perturbs the dose distribution which is dependent to the lung density and field size. The ICFs resulted from our MC model could be useful to accurately calculate the dose distribution in radiotherapy of lung abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 586
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
AllisyRoberts P, 2006, J INT COMMISSION RAD, V6
[2]   Dosimetric errors during treatment of centrally located lung tumors with stereotactic body radiation therapy: Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity corrections [J].
Altunbas, Cem ;
Kavanagh, Brian ;
Dzingle, Wayne ;
Stuhr, Kelly ;
Gaspar, Laurie ;
Miften, Moyed .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (04) :436-441
[3]  
Andreo P., 2000, IAEA TRS-398 Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: An International code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water, V10, P46
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Cancer facts figures 2008
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 85 AAPM
[6]   Dosimetric comparison of different inhomogeneity correction algorithms for external photon beam dose calculations [J].
Asnaashari, Khadijeh ;
Nodehi, Mohammad Rasa Golrokh ;
Mahdavi, Seyyed Rabie ;
Gholami, Somaye ;
Khosravi, Hamid Reza .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 38 (02) :74-81
[7]  
Chang-li R, 2015, INT J RADIAT RES, V13, P39
[8]   Evaluation of surface and build-up region dose for intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer [J].
Chung, HT ;
Jin, HS ;
Dempsey, JF ;
Liu, CH ;
Palta, J ;
Suh, TS ;
Kim, SY .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (08) :2682-2689
[9]   Percentage depth dose evaluation in heterogeneous media using thermoluminescent dosimetry [J].
da Rosa, L. A. R. ;
Cardoso, S. C. ;
Campos, L. T. ;
Alves, V. G. L. ;
Batista, D. V. S. ;
Facure, A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 11 (01) :117-127
[10]   Investigation of photon beam models in heterogeneous media of modern radiotherapy [J].
Ding W. ;
Johnston P.N. ;
Wong T.P.Y. ;
Bubb I.F. .
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2004, 27 (2) :39-48