Resorbable mesh in the treatment of orbital floor fractures

被引:74
作者
Hollier, LH
Rogers, N
Berzin, E
Stal, S
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Div Plast Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
关键词
orbit; orbital floor fractures; resorbable mesh; posttraumatic enophthalmos;
D O I
10.1097/00001665-200105000-00009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
A variety of materials have been used to reconstruct defects of the orbital floor. Autogenous materials such as bone and cartilage have the obvious drawback of the necessary donor site, whereas alloplastic implants carry the potential risk of infection, particularly when in communication with the maxillary sinus. Consequently, there has been interest in the use of resorbable alloplastic material that acts as a barrier until completely degraded. In this series, a total of 12 patients with orbital defects larger than 1 cm(2) were treated by the placement of a resorbable mesh plate of polyglycolic and polylactic acid (Lactosorb). Of the total of 12 patients treated, 3 were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 9 patients, the mean follow-up was 6 months, with the longest follow-up being 15 months and the shortest 1 month. Two patients developed enophthalmos. In each case, this measured 2 mm using Hertel exophthalmometry, and was present in the early postoperative period (less than 1 month). The cause of the enophthalmos in both patients was found to be a technical error in placement of the mesh. One patient developed an inflammatory reaction along the infraorbital rim requiring implant removal. This occurred at 7 months. From the above series, it is concluded that resorbable mesh is an acceptable material for reconstruction of the orbital floor in selected patients. It is believed that larger floor defects are better suited for nonresorbable alloplastic reconstruction, and that placement of the mesh over the infraorbital rim is unnecessary and places the patient at risk for a local inflammatory reaction.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 246
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Celikoz B, 1997, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V55, P240
[2]   Selection of materials for orbital floor reconstruction [J].
Chowdhury, K ;
Krause, GE .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1998, 124 (12) :1398-1401
[3]   Lactosorb panel and screws for repair of large orbital floor defects [J].
Enislidis, G ;
Pichorner, S ;
Kainberger, F ;
Ewers, R .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 25 (06) :316-321
[4]   Degradation characteristics of PLLA-PGA bone fixation devices [J].
Eppley, BL ;
Reilly, M .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 8 (02) :116-120
[5]   Resorbable plate fixation in pediatric craniofacial surgery [J].
Eppley, BL ;
Sadove, AM ;
Havlik, RJ .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 100 (01) :1-7
[6]   A magnetic resonance imaging investigation of potential subclinical complications after in situ cranial bone graft harvest [J].
Fearon, JA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (06) :1935-1939
[7]   The use of high-density polyethylene implants in facial deformities [J].
Frodel, JL ;
Lee, S .
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1998, 124 (11) :1219-1223
[8]   EXPERIENCE IN THE USE OF CALVARIAL BONE-GRAFTS IN ORBITAL RECONSTRUCTION [J].
ILANKOVAN, V ;
JACKSON, IT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1992, 30 (02) :92-96
[9]   In situ splitting of a rib graft for reconstruction of the orbital floor [J].
Johnson, PE ;
Raftopoulos, I .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 103 (06) :1709-1711
[10]   COMPLICATIONS OF HARVESTING CRANIAL BONE-GRAFTS [J].
KEEN, M .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1995, 96 (07) :1753-1753