Discussion paper: The R v T controversy: forensic evidence, law and logic

被引：6
作者：
Hamer, David [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源：
LAW PROBABILITY & RISK | 2012年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词：
COURT;
D O I：
10.1093/lpr/mgs021
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：331 / 345
页数：15
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] AFSP (Association of Forensic Science Providers), 2009, SCI JUSTICE, P49
  • [2] Expressing evaluative opinions: A position statement
    Aitken, Colin
    Berger, Charles E. H.
    Buckleton, John S.
    Champod, Christophe
    Curran, James
    Dawid, A. P.
    Evett, Ian W.
    Gill, Peter
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Joaquin
    Jackson, Graham
    Kloosterman, Ate
    Lovelock, Tina
    Lucy, David
    Margot, Pierre
    McKenna, Louise
    Meuwly, Didier
    Neumann, Cedric
    Daeid, Niamh Nic
    Nordgaard, Anders
    Puch-Solis, Roberto
    Rasmusson, Birgitta
    Redmayne, Mike
    Roberts, Paul
    Robertson, Bernard
    Roux, Claude
    Sjerps, Marjan J.
    Taroni, Franco
    Tjin-A-Tsoi, Tjark
    Vignaux, G. A.
    Willis, Sheila M.
    Zadora, Grzegorz
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2011, 51 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [3] Alldridge P., 1999, INT J EVIDENCE, V3, P141
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1982, JUDGMENT UNCERTAINTY
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, CAMB LAW J
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, CRIM LAW REV
  • [8] Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2009, 49 (03) : 161 - 164
  • [9] Berger C., 2010, NED JURISTENBLAD, V13, P784
  • [10] Re: Expressing evaluative opinions; A position statement Response
    Berger, C. E. H.
    Buckleton, J.
    Champod, C.
    Evett, I. W.
    Jackson, G.
    [J]. SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 2011, 51 (04) : 215 - 215
123