Precarious Employment and Psychosocial Hazards: A Cross-Sectional Study in Stockholm County

被引:11
作者
Kvart, Signild [1 ]
Jonsson, Johanna [1 ]
Bodin, Theo [1 ,2 ]
Hakansta, Carin [1 ,3 ]
Kreshpaj, Bertina [1 ]
Orellana, Cecilia [1 ]
ostergren, Per-Olof [4 ]
Nylen, Lotta [5 ,6 ]
Matilla-Santander, Nuria [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Unit Occupat Med, S-11365 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Ctr Occupat & Environm Med, S-11365 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karlstad Univ, Karlstad Business Sch, Working Life Sci, S-65188 Karlstad, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Malmo, Social Med & Global Hlth, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Global Publ Hlth, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Acad Primary Hlth Care Ctr, S-11365 Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
precarious employment; psychosocial work environment; work environment hazards; employment conditions; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT; WORK; HEALTH; QUALITY; GENDER; BIAS; TOOL;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph182111218
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Precarious employment (PE) has been linked to adverse health effects, possibly mediated through psychosocial hazards. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to explore if higher levels of PE are associated with psychosocial hazards (experiences of violence, sexual harassment, bullying, discrimination, high demands, and low control) and to explore gender differences in these patterns. The study is based on survey- and register data from a sample of 401 non-standard employees in Stockholm County (2016-2017). The level of PE (low/high) was assessed with the Swedish version of the employment precariousness scale (EPRES-Se) and analysed in relation to psychosocial hazards by means of generalized linear models, with the Poisson family and robust variances. After controlling for potential confounders (gender, age, country of birth, and education), the prevalence of suffering bullying (PR 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13) and discrimination (PR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.00-2.32) was higher among individuals with a high level of PE. Regarding the demand/control variables, a high level of PE was also associated with low control (PR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.30-1.96) and passive work (the combination of low demands and low control) (PR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.23-2.08). Our findings suggest that workers in PE are more likely to experience psychosocial hazards, and these experiences are more prevalent among women compared to men. Future longitudinal studies should look further into these associations and their implications for health and health inequalities.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Alfonsson J., 2018, NOMADERNA SVENSKA AR, P28
[2]  
Alfonsson J, 2015, ARBETSMARKNAD ARBETS, V21, P16
[3]   Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods [J].
Althubaiti, Alaa .
JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2016, 9 :211-217
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, SWEDISH WORK ENV AUT
[5]  
Aronsson G., 2002, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, V11, P151, DOI DOI 10.1080/13594320143000898
[6]   Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: An empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio [J].
Aluísio JD Barros ;
Vânia N Hirakata .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3 (1) :1-13
[7]   Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research [J].
Baruch, Yehuda ;
Holtom, Brooks C. .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2008, 61 (08) :1139-1160
[8]  
Berglund T, 2017, NORD J WORKING LIFE, V7, P27
[9]   Precarious employment in occupational health-an OMEGA-NET working group position paper [J].
Bodin, Theo ;
Caglayan, Cigdem ;
Garde, Anne Helene ;
Gnesi, Marco ;
Jonsson, Johanna ;
Kiran, Sibel ;
Kreshpaj, Bertina ;
Leinonen, Taina ;
Mehlum, Ingrid S. ;
Nena, Evangelia ;
Orellana, Cecilia ;
Peckham, Trevor ;
Seixas, Noah ;
Vanroelen, Christophe ;
Julia, Mireia .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2020, 46 (03) :321-329
[10]   Gendered work conditions, health, and work outcomes [J].
Bond, Meg A. ;
Punnett, Laura ;
Pyle, Jean L. ;
Cazeca, Dianne ;
Cooperman, Manuela .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 9 (01) :28-45