Validation of a case definition to define chronic dialysis using outpatient administrative data

被引:35
作者
Clement, Fiona M. [1 ,3 ]
James, Matthew T. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chin, Rick [1 ,3 ]
Klarenbach, Scott W. [5 ]
Manns, Braden J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Quinn, Robert R. [1 ]
Ravani, Pietro [1 ]
Tonelli, Marcello [5 ]
Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Libin Cardiovasc Inst, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Calgary Populat & Publ Hlth Inst, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, WC Mackenzie Hlth Sci Ctr 2J2 00, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
CLASSIFICATION-OF-DISEASES; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; CLINICAL-DATA; OUTCOMES; CODES; VALIDITY; ICD-9-CM; FAILURE; COMORBIDITIES; DATABASES;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2288-11-25
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Administrative health care databases offer an efficient and accessible, though as-yet unvalidated, approach to studying outcomes of patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The objective of this study is to determine the validity of outpatient physician billing derived algorithms for defining chronic dialysis compared to a reference standard ESRD registry. Methods: A cohort of incident dialysis patients (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31, 2008) and prevalent chronic dialysis patients (Jan 1, 2008) was selected from a geographically inclusive ESRD registry and administrative database. Four administrative data definitions were considered: at least 1 outpatient claim, at least 2 outpatient claims, at least 2 outpatient claims at least 90 days apart, and continuous outpatient claims at least 90 days apart with no gap in claims greater than 21 days. Measures of agreement of the four administrative data definitions were compared to a reference standard (ESRD registry). Basic patient characteristics are compared between all 5 patient groups. Results: 1,118,097 individuals formed the overall population and 2,227 chronic dialysis patients were included in the ESRD registry. The three definitions requiring at least 2 outpatient claims resulted in kappa statistics between 0.60-0.80 indicating "substantial" agreement. "At least 1 outpatient claim" resulted in "excellent" agreement with a kappa statistic of 0.81. Conclusions: Of the four definitions, the simplest (at least 1 outpatient claim) performed comparatively to other definitions. The limitations of this work are the billing codes used are developed in Canada, however, other countries use similar billing practices and thus the codes could easily be mapped to other systems. Our reference standard ESRD registry may not capture all dialysis patients resulting in some misclassification. The registry is linked to on-going care so this is likely to be minimal. The definition utilized will vary with the research objective.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] *ALB HLTH WELLN, 2006, REP HLTH ALB
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2 CTR HLTH CAR POL R
  • [3] Measuring agreement of administrative data with chart data using prevalence unadjusted and adjusted kappa
    Chen, Guanmin
    Faris, Peter
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda
    Walker, Robin L.
    Quan, Hude
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 9
  • [4] K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification - Foreword
    Eknoyan, G
    Levin, NW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (02) : S14 - S266
  • [5] Overview of the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
    Clement, Fiona
    Manns, Braden J.
    Klarenbach, Scott
    James, Matthew T.
    Ravani, Pietro
    Pannu, Neesh
    Ahmed, Sofia B.
    MacRae, Jennifer
    Scott-Douglas, Nairne
    Jindal, Kailash
    Quinn, Robert
    Culleton, Bruce F.
    Wiebe, Natasha
    Krause, Richard
    Thorlacius, Laurel
    Tonelli, Marcello
    [J]. BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 10
  • [6] Co-morbidity data in outcomes research - Are clinical data derived from administrative databases a reliable alternative to chart review?
    Humphries, KH
    Rankin, JM
    Carere, RG
    Buller, CE
    Kiely, FM
    Spinelli, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (04) : 343 - 349
  • [7] Diabetes in Ontario - Determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm
    Hux, JE
    Flintoft, V
    Ivis, F
    Bica, A
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (03) : 512 - 516
  • [8] Juurlink D., 2006, Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database: A Validation Study, P8
  • [9] Failure of ICD-9-CM codes to identify patients with comorbid chronic kidney disease in diabetes
    Kern, EFO
    Maney, M
    Miller, DR
    Tseng, CL
    Tiwari, A
    Rajan, M
    Aron, D
    Pogach, L
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 41 (02) : 564 - 580
  • [10] Measurement of observer agreement
    Kundel, HL
    Polansky, M
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (02) : 303 - 308