Impact of Highway Nonuser Revenue on Equity Ratio: Exploratory Analysis

被引:3
作者
Agbelie, Bismark [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Amer, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 620 Michigan Ave NE, Washington, DC 20064 USA
关键词
Highway cost allocation; Highway user revenues; Highway nonuser revenues; Equity ratio; Revenue analysis;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000631
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In the United States, due to the continued decline of highway user revenues from traditional sources, many states have adopted the approach of using highway nonuser revenue sources to support highway infrastructure development. The objective of the present study is to investigate the impact of incorporating nonuser revenue sources when computing equity ratios. As of now, past highway cost allocation studies have not included nonuser revenue sources into equity analysis. For the present paper, user revenue analysis is carried out, and both user and nonuser revenue sources are also considered in the analysis. Where user and nonuser revenue sources are considered in the equity analysis, it is observed that: (1) on average, motorcycles, automobiles, and sport utility vehicles are currently overpaying their cost responsibilities by 9.5%; (2) buses are underpaying their cost responsibility by 27.2%; (3) single-unit trucks, on average, are underpaying their cost responsibilities by 25.3%; (4) single-trailer trucks are currently underpaying their cost responsibility by 31.1%; and (5) multitrailer trucks, on average, are currently underpaying their cost responsibilities by 34.7%. If both user and nonuser revenue sources are used simultaneously to support highway infrastructure development, then excluding highway nonuser revenues in equity analysis will result in 10 out of 13 vehicle classes not paying their equitable portion of the highway infrastructure cost.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Agbelie B.R., 2010, FORECASTING HIGHWAY
[2]   Updating State and Local Highway Cost Allocation and Revenue Attribution: A Case Study for Indiana [J].
Agbelie, Bismark R. D. K. ;
Volovski, Matthew ;
Zhang, Zhibo ;
Bardaka, Eleni ;
Labi, Samuel ;
Sinha, Kumares C. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2016, (2597) :1-10
[3]   Linking Interstate Pavement Preservation Investment to Performance: An Exploratory Aggregate Analysis [J].
Agbelie, Bismark R. D. K. ;
Labi, Samuel ;
Noureldin, Samy ;
Sinha, Kumares C. .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2015, 21 (04)
[4]   An empirical analysis of three econometric frameworks for evaluating economic impacts of transportation infrastructure expenditures across countries [J].
Agbelie, Bismark R. D. K. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2014, 35 :304-310
[5]  
Ahmed A., 2012, FHWAINJTRP201301 PUR FHWAINJTRP201301 PUR
[6]   Highway maintenance marginal costs: What if the fourth power assumption is not valid? [J].
Anani, Shadi B. ;
Madanat, Samer M. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2010, 17 (06) :486-495
[7]   Electric mobility in Europe: A comprehensive review of motivators and barriers in decision making processes [J].
Biresselioglu, Mehmet Efe ;
Kaplan, Melike Demirbag ;
Yilmaz, Barbara Katharina .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 109 :1-13
[8]  
Carey J., 2001, IMPLEMENTATION SIMPL
[9]  
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 1997, Final report on the 1997 Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study
[10]  
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), 2014, TRAFF MON GUID VEH T TRAFF MON GUID VEH T