Prospective of Upfront Nitrogen (N2) Removal in LNG Plants: Technical Communication

被引:9
作者
Almomani, Fares [1 ]
Othman, Asmaa [1 ]
Pal, Ajinkya [1 ,2 ]
Al-Musleh, Easa, I [1 ]
Karimi, Iftekhar A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Chem Engn, POB 2713, Doha, Qatar
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119077, Singapore
关键词
natural gas; nitrogen removal; process optimization; energy recovery; INTEGRATED PROCESS CONFIGURATION; CATION-EXCHANGE MODIFICATION; NATURAL-GAS LIQUEFACTION; SWING ADSORPTION PROCESS; MIXED-MATRIX MEMBRANES; ENHANCED SEPARATION; CO2/N-2; SEPARATION; HYDRATE FORMATION; CARBON-DIOXIDE; METHANE;
D O I
10.3390/en14123616
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Conventional natural gas (NG) liquefaction processes remove N-2 near the tail of the plant, which limits production capacity and decreases energy efficiency and profit. Engineering calculations suggest that upfront N-2 removal could have substantial economic benefits on large-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG) processes. This article provides an overview of the most promising technologies that can be employed for upfront N-2 removal in the LNG process, focusing on the process selection and design considerations of all currently available upfront N-2 removal technologies. The literature review revealed that although adsorption has proven to be a huge success in gas separation processes (efficiency >= 90%), most of the available adsorbents are CH4-selective at typical NG conditions. It would be more encouraging to find N-2-selective adsorbents to apply in upfront N-2 removal technology. Membrane gas separation has shown growing performance due to its flexible operation, small footprint, and reduced investment cost and energy consumption. However, the use of such technology as upfront N-2 removal requires multi-stage membranes to reduce the nitrogen content and satisfy LNG specifications. The efficiency of such technology should be correlated with the cost of gas re-compression, product quality, and pressure. A hybrid system of adsorption/membrane processes was proposed to eliminate the disadvantages of both technologies and enhance productivity that required further investigation. Upfront N-2 removal technology based on sequential high and low-pressure distillation was presented and showed interesting results. The distillation process, operated with at least 17.6% upfront N-2 removal, reduced specific power requirements by 5% and increased the plant capacity by 16% in a 530 MMSCFD LNG plant. Lithium-cycle showed promising results as an upfront N-2 chemical removal technology. Recent studies showed that this process could reduce the NG N-2 content at ambient temperature and 80 bar from 10% to 0.5% N-2, achieving the required LNG specifications. Gas hydrate could have the potential as upfront N-2 removal technology if the is process modified to guarantee significant removals of low N-2 concentration from a mixture of hydrocarbons. Retrofitting the proposed technologies into LNG plants, design alterations, removal limits, and cost analysis are challenges that are open for further exploration in the near future. The present review offers directions for different researchers to explore different alternatives for upfront N-2 removal from NG.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   A new seeding method, dry rolling applied to synthesize SAPO-34 zeolite membrane for nitrogen/methane separation [J].
Alam, Syed Fakhar ;
Kim, Min-Zy ;
Kim, Young Jin ;
Rehman, Aafaq Ur ;
Devipriyanka, Arepalli ;
Sharma, Pankaj ;
Yeo, Jeong-Gu ;
Lee, Jin-Seok ;
Kim, Hyunuk ;
Cho, Churl-Hee .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2020, 602
[2]   Natural gas processing with membranes: An overview [J].
Baker, Richard W. ;
Lokhandwala, Kaaeid .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2008, 47 (07) :2109-2121
[3]  
Ballard A.L., 2002, J SUPRAMOL CHEM, V2, P385, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1472-7862(03)00063-7, 10.1016/S1472-7862(03)00063-7, 10.1016/S1472-7862, DOI 10.1016/S1472-7862]
[4]   Porous aromatic frameworks: Synthesis, structure and functions [J].
Ben, Teng ;
Qiu, Shilun .
CRYSTENGCOMM, 2013, 15 (01) :17-26
[5]   Membrane Gas Separation: A Review/State of the Art [J].
Bernardo, P. ;
Drioli, E. ;
Golemme, G. .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2009, 48 (10) :4638-4663
[6]  
Bomberger D.C., 1999, NITROGEN REMOVAL NAT
[7]  
Bouabidi Z, 2021, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V151
[8]   Recovery of methane from coal-bed methane gas mixture via hydrate-based methane separation method by adding anionic surfactants [J].
Cai, Jing ;
Xu, Chun-Gang ;
Chen, Zhao-Yang ;
Li, Xiao-Sen .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2018, 40 (09) :1019-1026
[9]   A robust calcium-based microporous metal-organic framework for efficient CH4/N2 separation [J].
Chang, Miao ;
Ren, Jiahao ;
Yang, Qingyuan ;
Liu, Dahuan .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 408
[10]   Benefits and drawbacks of clathrate hydrates: a review of their areas of interest [J].
Chatti, I ;
Delahaye, A ;
Fournaison, L ;
Petitet, JP .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 46 (9-10) :1333-1343