Do raising environmental costs promote industrial green growth? A Quasi-natural experiment based on the policy of raising standard sewage charges

被引:42
作者
Cheng, Zhonghua [1 ]
Li, Xiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, China Inst Mfg Dev, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Raising environmental costs; The policy of raising standard sewage charges; Industrial green growth; Green total factor productivity; Multi-time Differences-in-Differences method; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; TECHNICAL PROGRESS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CARBON INTENSITY; CHINA; EMISSIONS; SECTOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, countries have actively promoted green economic transformation. Formulating reasonable and effective environmental regulation policies is an important way to realize this transformation. Based on a policy of raising standard sewage charges in China, this paper selects the panel data of 30 provinces from 2000 to 2018 and adopts the multi-time Differences-in-Differences (DID) method to empirically examine the effect of raising environmental costs on industrial green total factor productivity (GTFP). This paper finds that industrial GTFP is significantly increased by raising standard sewage charges. The conclusion is still valid after alleviating the endogenous problem and conducting robustness tests. The policy gives a boost to industrial GTFP in Eastern and Western regions, but not significantly in Central regions, according to the heterogeneity test. Further analyses of its transmission process reveal that raising environmental costs can promote industrial green growth, mostly via technological and structural effect. As a result, if all provinces can optimize and upgrade their industrial structures and improve their levels of technological innovation when faced with increasingly strict environ-mental regulations, they will be able to better change the model of economic growth and realize green industrial development.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[2]  
Battese GE., 2002, International Journal of Business and Economics, V1, P87
[3]   Do Unions Affect Innovation? [J].
Bradley, Daniel ;
Kim, Incheol ;
Tian, Xuan .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (07) :2251-2271
[4]   Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry [J].
Broberg, Thomas ;
Marklund, Per-Olov ;
Samakovlis, Eva ;
Hammar, Henrik .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2013, 40 (01) :43-56
[5]   Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China [J].
Cai, Xiqian ;
Lu, Yi ;
Wu, Mingqin ;
Yu, Linhui .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 :73-85
[6]   Research on meta-frontier total-factor energy efficiency and its spatial convergence in Chinese provinces [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Liu, Jun ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Gu, Xinbei .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 86
[7]   The impact of foreign direct investment on urban PM2.5 pollution in China [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Liu, Jun .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 265
[8]   Total-factor carbon emission efficiency of China's provincial industrial sector and its dynamic evolution [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Liu, Jun ;
Zhang, Huiming .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 94 :330-339
[9]   Industrial structure, technical progress and carbon intensity in China's provinces [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Liu, Jun .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 :2935-2946
[10]   The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools [J].
Cheng, Zhonghua ;
Li, Lianshui ;
Liu, Jun .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 149 :191-205