Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anesthetics: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials

被引:57
作者
Zaric, D
Christiansen, C
Pace, NL
Punjasawadwong, Y
机构
[1] Frederiksberg Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Anesthesiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000136844.87857.78
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Lidocaine has been used for spinal anesthesia since 1948, seemingly without causing concern. However, during the last 10 years, a number of reports have appeared implicating lidocaine as a possible cause of neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia. Follow-up of patients who received uncomplicated spinal anesthesia revealed that some of them developed pain in the lower extremities - transient neurologic symptoms (TNS). In this study, we sought to compare the frequency of 1) TNS and 2) neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine with that after other local anesthetics. Published trials were identified by computerized searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, LILAC, and EMBASE and by checking the reference lists of trials and review articles. The search identified 14 trials reporting 1347 patients, 117 of whom developed TNS. None of these patients showed signs of neurologic complications. The relative risk for developing TNS after spinal anesthesia with lidocaine was higher than with other local anesthetics (bupivacaine, prilocaine, procaine, and mepivacaine), i.e., 4.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.98-9.54). There was no evidence that this painful condition was associated with any neurologic pathology; in all patients, the symptoms disappeared spontaneously by the 10th postoperative day.
引用
收藏
页码:1811 / 1816
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Does pregnancy protect against intrathecal lidocaine-induced transient neurologic symptoms? [J].
Aouad, MT ;
Siddik, SS ;
Jalbout, MI ;
Baraka, AS .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (02) :401-404
[2]   A transient neurological deficit following intrathecal injection of 1% hyperbaric bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anaesthesia [J].
Casati, A ;
Fanelli, G ;
Aldegheri, G ;
Berti, M ;
Leoni, A ;
Torri, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (01) :112-113
[3]   NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS AFTER ANESTHESIA - A FOLLOW-UP OF 18000 SPINAL AND EPIDURAL ANESTHETICS PERFORMED OVER 3 YEARS [J].
DAHLGREN, N ;
TORNBRANDT, K .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 (07) :872-880
[4]   The incidence of transient neurological symptoms after spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine compared to prilocaine [J].
de Weert, K ;
Traksel, M ;
Gielen, M ;
Slappendel, R ;
Weber, E ;
Dirksen, R .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (10) :1020-1024
[5]   NEUROTOXICITY OF LIDOCAINE - DOES IT EXIST [J].
DOUGLAS, MJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (03) :181-185
[6]   Lidocaine spinal anesthesia - A vanishing therapeutic index? [J].
Drasner, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) :469-472
[7]   Cauda equina syndrome following a single spinal administration of 5% hyperbaric lidocaine through a 25-gauge Whitacre needle [J].
Gerancher, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) :687-689
[8]   TRANSIENT NEUROLOGIC SYMPTOMS AFTER SPINAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
HAMPL, KF ;
SCHNEIDER, MC ;
UMMENHOFER, W ;
DREWE, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (06) :1148-1153
[9]   Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia - A lower incidence with prilocaine and bupivacaine than with lidocaine [J].
Hampl, KF ;
Heinzmann-Wiedmer, S ;
Luginbuehl, I ;
Harms, C ;
Seeberger, M ;
Schneider, MC ;
Drasner, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (03) :629-633
[10]   A similar incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with 2% and 5% lidocaine [J].
Hampl, KF ;
Schneider, MC ;
Pargger, H ;
Gut, J ;
Drewe, J ;
Drasner, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (05) :1051-1054