Interprofessional objective structured clinical examination with physician assistant and pharmacy students - A qualitative and quantitative study

Background: To assess the impact of an interprofessional objective structured clinical examination (iOSCE) on attitudes/perceptions regarding interprofessional practice (IPP) and to determine if patient (simulated) outcomes improved with interprofessional collaboration (pharmacy and physician assistant (PA) students). Interprofessional education activity: A team of interprofessional faculty designed an iOSCE case and grading checklist containing key interventions. Students individually reviewed the case and were asked to document potential changes to the admission orders. Then they were given the opportunity to collaborate in an interprofessional team to discuss the case and orders. Finally, the team presented their recommendations to an interprofessional faculty panel. Individual and team scores were compared to determine the impact of interprofessional collaboration. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) questionnaire was administered pre- and post-iOSCE to assess changes in opinions about interprofessional learning. Discussion: Individual and team iOSCE scores for 187 students were evaluated (86 PA and 101 pharmacy). A 21% absolute increase in the number of key interventions was found when comparing average individual scores to average team scores (2.11/5 vs. 3.18/5, p < 0.001). While in aggregate the students had a positive attitude towards IPE pre-iOSCE, RIPLS responses were strengthened post-iOSCE.