Discrepancies in International Normalized Ratio Results between Instruments: A Model to Split the Variation into Subcomponents

被引:22
作者
Solvik, Una O. [1 ]
Petersen, Per H. [1 ]
Monsen, Grete [2 ]
Stavelin, Anne V. [1 ,2 ]
Sandberg, Sverre [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Hlth Care, Fac Med & Dent, N-5020 Bergen, Norway
[2] Haraldsplass Hosp, Norwegian Qual Improvement Primary Care Labs NOKL, Bergen, Norway
[3] Haukeland Hosp, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
关键词
ORAL ANTICOAGULANT TREATMENT; PROTHROMBIN TIME; LUPUS ANTICOAGULANTS; TESTING DEVICES; INR; CALIBRATION; AGREEMENT; SENSITIVITY; REAGENTS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1373/clinchem.2010.146233
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Observed differences between results obtained from comparison of instruments used to measure international normalized ratio (INR) have been higher than expected from the imprecision of the instruments. In this study the variation of these differences was divided into subcomponents, and each of the subcomponents was estimated. METHODS: Blood samples were collected at 4 different patient visits from each of 36 outpatients who were receiving warfarin treatment and were included in the study. INR was determined on 1 laboratory instrument (STA Compact (R)) and 3 point-of-care instruments (Simple Simon (R) PT, CoaguChek (R) XS, and INRatio (TM)). All 4 INR instruments were compared in pairs. Linear regression was used to correct for systematic deviations. The remaining variation of the differences was subdivided into between-subject, within-subject, and analytical variation in an ANOVA nested design. RESULTS: The mean difference between instruments varied between 1.0% and 14.3%. Between-subject variation of the differences (expressed as CV) varied between 3.3% and 7.4%, whereas within-subject variation of the differences was approximately 5% for all 6 comparisons. The analytical imprecision of the differences varied between 3.8% and 8.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in INR between instruments were subdivided into calibration differences, between-and within-subject variation, and analytical imprecision. The magnitude of each subcomponent was estimated. Within results for individual patients the difference in INR between 2 instruments varied over time. The reasons for the between-and within-subject variations of the differences can probably be ascribed to different patient-specific effects in the patient plasma. To minimize this variation in a monitoring situation, each site and patient should use results from only 1 type of instrument. (c) 2010 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
引用
收藏
页码:1618 / 1626
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] Vitamin K-dependent coagulation factor deficiency in trauma: a comparative analysis between international normalized ratio and thromboelastography (CME)
    Nascimento, Bartolomeu
    Al Mahoos, Mohammed
    Callum, Jeannie
    Capone, Antonio
    Pacher, Jennifer
    Tien, Homer
    Rizoli, Sandro
    TRANSFUSION, 2012, 52 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [22] Mid-term results of self-testing of the international normalized ratio in adults with a mechanical heart valve
    Azarnoush, Kasra
    Dorigo, Enrica
    Pereira, Bruno
    Dauphin, Claire
    Geoffroy, Etienne
    Dauphin, Nicolas
    D'Ostrevy, Nicola
    Legault, Benoit
    Camilleri, Lionel
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2014, 133 (02) : 149 - 153
  • [23] Nontherapeutic international normalized ratio results in hospital emergency patients on vitamin K antagonists: prevalence and associated factors
    Lopez Altimiras, Xavier
    Gene Tous, Emili
    De Giorgi, Antonio
    Gadea Polo, Andres
    Martin Horcajo, Raquel
    Jimenez Hernandez, Sonia
    EMERGENCIAS, 2017, 29 (02): : 93 - 98
  • [24] A comparison between capillary and venous blood international normalized ratio determinations in a portable prothrombin time device
    van den Besselaar, AMHP
    Meeuwisse-Braun, J
    Schaefer-van Mansfeld, H
    van Rijn, C
    Witteveen, E
    BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 2000, 11 (06) : 559 - 562
  • [25] Relationship between platelet indices and international normalized ratio in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
    Arik, Osman Ziya
    Ozkan, Bugra
    Kutlu, Rasim
    Karal, Huseyin
    Sahin, Durmus Yildiray
    Kaypakli, Onur
    Ozel, Deniz
    Cayil, Murat
    PLATELETS, 2014, 25 (05) : 311 - 316
  • [26] Kinetic-pharmacodynamic model of warfarin for prothrombin time-international normalized ratio in Japanese patients
    Hirai, Toshinori
    Aoyama, Takahiko
    Tsuji, Yasuhiro
    Itoh, Toshimasa
    Matsumoto, Yoshiaki
    Iwamoto, Takuya
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 90 (03) : 828 - 836
  • [27] Negative association between free triiodothyronine level and international normalized ratio in euthyroid subjects with acute myocardial infarction
    Li Li
    Chang-yan Guo
    Jing Yang
    En-zhi Jia
    Tie-bing Zhu
    Lian-sheng Wang
    Ke-jiang Cao
    Wen-zhu Ma
    Zhi-jian Yang
    Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, 2011, 32 : 1351 - 1356
  • [28] Disagreement between bedside and laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time and international normalized ratio for various novel anticoagulants
    Kemme, MJB
    Faaij, RA
    Schoemaker, RC
    Kluft, C
    Meijer, P
    Cohen, AF
    Burggraaf, J
    BLOOD COAGULATION & FIBRINOLYSIS, 2001, 12 (07) : 583 - 591
  • [29] Negative association between free triiodothyronine level and international normalized ratio in euthyroid subjects with acute myocardial infarction
    Li, Li
    Guo, Chang-yan
    Yang, Jing
    Jia, En-zhi
    Zhu, Tie-bing
    Wang, Lian-sheng
    Cao, Ke-jiang
    Ma, Wen-zhu
    Yang, Zhi-jian
    ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA SINICA, 2011, 32 (11) : 1351 - 1356
  • [30] The International Normalized Ratio of Prothrombin Time in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score: A Reliable Measure
    Kamath, Patrick S.
    CLINICS IN LIVER DISEASE, 2009, 13 (01) : 63 - +