Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type a for patients with glabellar lines

被引:148
|
作者
Carruthers, JD
Lowe, NJ
Menter, MA
Gibson, J
Eadie, N
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Ophthalmol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Div Dermatol, Waco, TX 76798 USA
[4] Allergan Pharmaceut Inc, Irvine, CA 92715 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.PRS.0000076504.79727.62
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of glabellar lines. Patients with moderate or severe glabellar lines at maximal frown received intramuscular injections of placebo or 20 U of botulinum toxin type A (Botox; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, Calif.) distributed among five injection sites (one in the procerus muscle and two in each corrugator supercilii). Follow-up assessments were performed at 7, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after injections. Efficacy measures were the physician's rating of glabellar line severity at maximal frown and at rest (none, mild, moderate, or severe) and the patient's global assessment of changes in glabellar lines, from + 4 (100 percent better) to -4 (100 percent worse). A total of 273 patients were enrolled (botulinum toxin, 202 patients, placebo, 71 patients). All except five patients (botulinum toxin, two patients; placebo, three patients) completed the study. For the physician's rating at maximal frown, the responder rate (percentage of patients with severity ratings of none or mild in follow-up evaluations) for the botulinum toxin group peaked at 77 percent at day 30 and was significantly greater than that for the placebo group at every follow-up visit (p < 0.001). For the patient's assessment, the responder rate (percentage of patients with scores of +2 or more) for the botulinum toxin group peaked at 89 percent at day 30 and was significantly greater than that for the placebo group at every follow-up visit (p < 0.001). Rates of adverse events were similar for the two groups. The only adverse event with an incidence of greater than or equal to5 percent was headache (botulinum toxin, 11 percent; placebo, 20 percent). The incidence of blepharoptosis was I percent for the botulinum toxin group. Botulinum toxin type A was remarkably safe and effective in reducing glabellar lines.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1098
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines
    Carruthers, JA
    Lowe, NJ
    Menter, MA
    Gibson, J
    Nordquist, M
    Mordaunt, J
    Walker, P
    Eadie, N
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2002, 46 (06) : 840 - 849
  • [2] Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines in Chinese: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study
    Wu, Yan
    Zhao, Guang
    Li, Hengjin
    Zheng, Zhizhong
    Zhong, Shaomin
    Yang, Zhiyong
    Feng, Zheng
    Yang, Qinping
    Zhu, Xuejun
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2010, 36 (01) : 102 - 108
  • [3] A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety of 3 doses of botulinum toxin A in the treatment of glabellar lines
    Ascher, B
    Zakine, B
    Kestemont, P
    Baspeyras, M
    Bougara, A
    Santini, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 51 (02) : 223 - 233
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trials
    Guo, Yu
    Lu, Yongzhou
    Liu, Tianyi
    Zhou, Yiqun
    Yang, Ping
    Zhu, Jingjing
    Chen, Liang
    Yang, Qingjian
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 136 (03) : 310E - 318E
  • [5] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of botulinum toxin type a for the treatment of glabellar lines: Determination of optimal dose
    Monheit, Gary
    Carruthers, Alastair
    Brandt, Fredric
    Rand, Rhonda
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2007, 33 : S51 - S59
  • [6] Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of a New Botulinum Toxin Type A for Treatment of Glabellar Lines: Efficacy and Safety
    Brandt, Fredric
    Swanson, Neil
    Baumann, Leslie
    Huber, Barbara
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2009, 35 (12) : 1893 - 1901
  • [7] Botulinum toxin type B: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, safety and efficacy study in cervical dystonia
    Lew, MF
    Adornato, BT
    Duane, DD
    Dykstra, DD
    Factor, SA
    Massey, JM
    Brin, MF
    Jankovic, J
    Rodnitzky, RL
    Singer, C
    Swenson, MR
    Tarsy, D
    Murray, JJ
    Koller, M
    Wallace, JD
    NEUROLOGY, 1997, 49 (03) : 701 - 707
  • [8] Correlation of Botulinum Toxin Dose with Neurophysiological Parameters of Efficacy and Safety in the Glabellar Muscles: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Study
    Alimohammadi, Mohammad
    Andersson, Mats
    Punga, Anna Rostedt
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2014, 94 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
    Lowe, NJ
    Yamauchi, PS
    Lask, GP
    Patnaik, R
    Iyer, S
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2002, 28 (09) : 822 - 827
  • [10] Double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of drooling in parkinsonism
    Mancini, F
    Zangaglia, R
    Cristina, S
    Sommaruga, MG
    Martignoni, E
    Nappi, G
    Pacchetti, C
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2003, 18 (06) : 685 - 688