Differential Cost-Sharing Undermines Treatment Adherence to Combination Therapy: Evidence from Diabetes Treatment

被引:2
作者
Nelson, David R. [1 ]
Heaton, Pamela [2 ]
Hincapie, Ana [2 ]
Ghodke, Shirin [3 ]
Chen, Jieling [1 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Corp Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, James L Winkle Coll Pharm, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Eli Lilly Serv India Private Ltd, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
关键词
Adherence; Healthcare out-of-pocket costs; Diabetes combination therapy; Insurance design; Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS); HEALTH-CARE COSTS; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; MORAL HAZARD; INSURANCE; MELLITUS; PIOGLITAZONE;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-021-01098-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The objective of this study was to measure the influence of differences in out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for type 2 diabetes (T2D) medications on within-patient adherence behavior towards combination drug therapy regimens. Methods This was an observational, retrospective, paired sample study in patients with T2D using longitudinal pharmacy data from the 2009-2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) augmented with socio-demographic factors. We took a within-patient approach to minimize confounding effects by including patients who maintained the same number of diabetes drug classes over 2 years of MEPS. For each patient, we selected the most and least costly drug classes in the second year and examined their corresponding adherence behavior measured by medication possession ratio. The primary hypothesis tested the significance of the correlation between magnitude of the OOP cost difference and behavioral response in adherence. Results Analysis included 1189 patients representing over 4.2 million US residents with T2D. A significant negative correlation (p < 0.001) was observed between the differences of OOP costs and adherence to the most and least costly medications compared within patients. Reduction in adherence to the most costly medication was generally observed when the difference in OOP costs was greater than $33/month. A greater variability in adherence was observed when the cost difference exceeded $2.39/month as compared to other cost difference ranges (p < 0.001), indicative of choices being made. Conclusions As OOP costs increased, adherence variability increased initially until a cost threshold, beyond which the adherence to the more costly medication decreased. In addition to OOP cost, adherence was also influenced by type of medication and self-perception of health. Given the complex correlation between OOP costs and adherence to medication, we suggest a careful approach to cost-sharing in the current insurance drug design and relevant insurance policies.
引用
收藏
页码:2149 / 2164
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes. Results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT): a randomized trial [J].
Abdul-Ghani, M. A. ;
Puckett, C. ;
Triplitt, C. ;
Maggs, D. ;
Adams, J. ;
Cersosimo, E. ;
DeFronzo, R. A. .
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2015, 17 (03) :268-275
[2]   Value-Based Insurance Design Improves Medication Adherence Without An Increase In Total Health Care Spending [J].
Agarwal, Rajender ;
Gupta, Ashutosh ;
Fendrick, A. Mark .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2018, 37 (07) :1057-1064
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, MEPS HC PAN DES COLL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, NHE FACT SHEET
[6]   Predictors of medication adherence and associated health care costs in an older population with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A longitudinal cohort study [J].
Balkrishnan, R ;
Rajagopalan, R ;
Camacho, FT ;
Huston, SA ;
Murray, FT ;
Anderson, RT .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 25 (11) :2958-2971
[7]   ROBUST TESTS FOR EQUALITY OF VARIANCES [J].
BROWN, MB ;
FORSYTHE, AB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (346) :364-367
[8]   Type 2 diabetes patients' and providers' differing perspectives on medication nonadherence: a qualitative meta-synthesis [J].
Brundisini, Francesca ;
Vanstone, Meredith ;
Hulan, Danielle ;
DeJean, Deirdre ;
Giacomini, Mita .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
[9]   Making sense of sensitivity: extending omitted variable bias [J].
Cinelli, Carlos ;
Hazlett, Chad .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2020, 82 (01) :39-67
[10]  
Claxton G., Employer Health Benefits 2007 Annual Survey