Mapping urban forest leaf area index with airborne lidar using penetration metrics and allometry

被引:105
作者
Alonzo, Michael [1 ]
Bookhagen, Bodo [2 ]
McFadden, Joseph P. [1 ]
Sun, Alex [1 ]
Roberts, Dar A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Geog, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Potsdam, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, D-14467 Potsdam, Germany
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Airborne lidar; Leaf area index; Urban ecosystem analysis; Hemispherical photography; Allometry; Vegetation structure; VEGETATION COVER; INDIVIDUAL TREES; RANGING LIDAR; HEIGHT; ANGLE; CANOPIES; SURFACE; MODEL; SIZE; LAI;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In urban areas, leaf area index (LAI) is a key ecosystem structural attribute with implications for energy and water balance, gas exchange, and anthropogenic energy use. In this study, we estimated LAI spatially using airborne lidar in downtown Santa Barbara, California, USA. We implemented two different modeling approaches. First, we directly estimated effective LAI (LAIe) using scan angle- and clump-corrected lidar laser penetration metrics (LPM). Second, we adapted existing allometric equations to estimate crown structural metrics including tree height and crown base height using lidar. The latter approach allowed for LAI estimates at the individual tree-crown scale. The LPM method, at both high and decimated point densities, resulted in good linear agreement with estimates from ground-based hemispherical photography (r(2) = 0.82, y = 0.99x) using a model that assumed a spherical leaf angle distribution. Within individual tree crown segments, the lidar estimates of crown structure closely paralleled field measurements (e.g., r(2) = 0.87 for crown length). LAI estimates based on the lidar crown measurements corresponded well with estimates from field measurements (r(2) = 0.84, y = 0.97x + 0.10). Consistency of the LPM and allometric lidar methods was also strong at 71 validation plots (r(2) = 0.88) and at 450 additional sample locations across the entire study area (r(2) = 0.72). This level of correspondence exceeded that of the canopy hemispherical photography and allometric, ground-based estimates (r(2) = 0.53). The first-order alignment of these two disparate methods may indicate that the error bounds for mapping LAI in cities are small enough to pursue large scale, spatially explicit estimation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 153
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Urban tree species mapping using hyperspectral and lidar data fusion [J].
Alonzo, Michael ;
Bookhagen, Bodo ;
Roberts, Dar A. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 148 :70-83
[2]   A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods [J].
Andersen, Hans-Erik ;
Reutebuch, Stephen E. ;
McGaughey, Robert J. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 32 (05) :355-366
[3]   A CANOPY STOMATAL-RESISTANCE MODEL FOR GASEOUS DEPOSITION TO VEGETATED SURFACES [J].
BALDOCCHI, DD ;
HICKS, BB ;
CAMARA, P .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1987, 21 (01) :91-101
[4]   Ground-based measurements of leaf area index:: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies [J].
Bréda, NJJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2003, 54 (392) :2403-2417
[5]   On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index [J].
Carlson, TN ;
Ripley, DA .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 62 (03) :241-252
[7]   DEFINING LEAF-AREA INDEX FOR NON-FLAT LEAVES [J].
CHEN, JM ;
BLACK, TA .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 15 (04) :421-429
[8]   Leaf area index of boreal forests: Theory, techniques, and measurements [J].
Chen, JM ;
Rich, PM ;
Gower, ST ;
Norman, JM ;
Plummer, S .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D24) :29429-29443
[9]   MEASURING LEAF-AREA INDEX OF PLANT CANOPIES WITH BRANCH ARCHITECTURE [J].
CHEN, JM ;
BLACK, TA .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1991, 57 (1-3) :1-12
[10]   Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) for Individual Tree Stem Location, Height, and Biomass Measurements [J].
Edson, Curtis ;
Wing, Michael G. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 3 (11) :2494-2528