Molecular modelling and experimental studies on steam gasification of low-rank coals catalysed by iron species

被引:24
作者
Domazetis, George [1 ]
Raoarun, Monthida [1 ]
James, Bruce D. [1 ]
Liesegang, John [2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Dept Chem, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Dept Phys, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
steam gasification; brown coal; iron catalyst; molecular models;
D O I
10.1016/j.apcata.2008.01.037
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Pyrolysis and catalytic steam gasification of brown coal containing iron hydroxyl complexes have been investigated experimentally and with semi-empirical and density functional theory molecular modelling. Pyrolysis yielded mainly CO2, CO, and reduced iron species. Catalytic steam gasification at 900 degrees C after 15 min, consumed 20 wt.% additional char and a higher than expected yield of H-2 due to post-gasification reactions; inorganic and organic oxygen in char increased compared to pyrolysis. Apparent turnover numbers for catalytic gasification were 12-22 mole of carbon per mole of iron. The distribution of iron species in brown coal indicated small iron clusters are likely to form on heating; pyrolysis was thus modelled using molecules of char with[Fe-3], [Fe-5] and [Fe3O], and the active site for gasification was shown to be [Fe-C]. The mechanism of catalytic gasification involved H2O chemi-adsorbed on [Fe-C], formation of the [Fe <- OH2] coordination bond, with H-2 produced via iron hydride complexes. Formation of CO was via oxygen insertion into [Fe-C] to form [Fe-O-C] that decomposed into CO and another [Fe-C] site. Lower activation barriers were obtained for concerted chemistry involving iron-hydrides. Active sites in char were accessible to H2O as pores had developed around iron species; large sized iron species were not catalytically active but caused large pores to form in char. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 118
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Thermal and gas analyses of the reaction between iron carbide and steam with hydrogen generation at 573 K [J].
Akiyama, T ;
Miyazaki, A ;
Nakanishi, H ;
Hisa, M ;
Tsutsumi, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2004, 29 (07) :721-724
[2]  
BHADESHIA HKD, XRAY DIFFRACTION MIX
[3]   Reactivity of chars and carbons: New insights through molecular modeling [J].
Bhatia, SK .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1998, 44 (11) :2478-2493
[4]   Modeling of laminar pulverized coal flames with speciated devolatilization and comparisons with experiments [J].
Bradley, D ;
Lawes, M ;
Park, HY ;
Usta, N .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2006, 144 (1-2) :190-204
[5]   ANALYSIS OF CHEMICAL-REACTION KINETICS USING A DISTRIBUTION OF ACTIVATION-ENERGIES AND SIMPLER MODELS [J].
BRAUN, RL ;
BURNHAM, AK .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1987, 1 (02) :153-161
[6]   Combustion theory and modeling [J].
Buckmaster, J ;
Clavin, P ;
Liñán, A ;
Matalon, M ;
Peters, N ;
Sivashinsky, G ;
Williams, FA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2005, 30 :1-19
[7]  
Carley A. F., 2002, SURFACE CHEM CATALYS
[8]   Numerical simulation of entrained flow coal gasifiers. Part I: modeling of coal gasification in an entrained flow gasifier [J].
Chen, CX ;
Horio, M ;
Kojima, T .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2000, 55 (18) :3861-3874
[9]   Unified mechanism of alkali and alkaline earth catalyzed gasification reactions of carbon by CO2 and H2O [J].
Chen, SG ;
Yang, RT .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1997, 11 (02) :421-427
[10]   Analytical and characterization studies of organic and inorganic species in brown coal [J].
Domazetis, G. ;
Raoarun, M. ;
James, B. D. ;
Liesegang, J. ;
Pigram, P. J. ;
Brack, N. ;
Glaisher, R. .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2006, 20 (04) :1556-1564