METACOGNITION IN PRESCHOOL CHILDREN - INDICATORS, DEVELOPMENTAL AND SOCIO-EDUCATIONAL DIFFERENCES

被引:0
作者
Maric, Mia [1 ]
Sakac, Marija [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Educ Sombor, Podgoricka 4, Sombor 25000, Serbia
来源
CESKOSLOVENSKA PSYCHOLOGIE | 2020年 / 64卷 / 01期
关键词
metacognitive abilities; self-regulation; problem solving; preschoolers; UTILIZATION DEFICIENCIES; STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGE; PERFORMANCE; AWARENESS; MEMORY; TRENDS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine presence of metacognitive manifestations in the different phases of problem solving and to examine developmental and socio-educational differences in metacognition in preschoolers, with respect to children's gender, age, socioeconomic status of the family, parent's education and type of preschool institution. Sample and settings. The sample included 418 preschool children, aged 3-6 years. Research was conducted in preschool institutions. The conditions were standardized and controlled by researchers - the researcher gave clear instruction to children before each task. Hypotheses. It was assumed that preschool children are able to manifest verbal and nonverbal metacognition indicators and that these manifestations are related to children's age and socio-educational factors, such as socio-economic status of the family, parent's education and type of preschool institution. Statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to determine presence of metacognitive manifestations. Two-factorial ANO VA was applied to examine gender and age differences. The post-hoc analysis (GLM) was conducted to test influence of socio-educational factors. Results. It is showed that preschoolers use verbal and non-verbal metacognitive responses in different phases of problem solving. Older children manifested more indicators of metacognition. Also, socio-economic status of the family and parent's education showed as significant factors which contribute to differences in metacognitive manifestations in preschoolers. Study limitations. Metacognition was measured without testing strategies which could enhance it, so future research would test influence of these strategies on development of metacognition in preschoolers.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Cultural capital in context: Heterogeneous returns to cultural capital across schooling environments
    Andersen, Ida Gran
    Jaeger, Mads Meier
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2015, 50 : 177 - 188
  • [2] Anderson H., 2003, DEV INDEPENDET LEARN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Metacognition in Young Children
  • [4] Cultural and educational careers: The dynamics of social reproduction
    Aschaffenburg, K
    Maas, I
    [J]. AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1997, 62 (04) : 573 - 587
  • [5] Baker L., 2000, Issues in the measurement of metacognition, P99
  • [6] Cultural capital, ambition and the explanation of inequalities in learning outcomes: A comparative analysis
    Barone, Carlo
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 40 (06): : 1039 - 1058
  • [7] Instructing children to use memory strategies: Evidence of utilization deficiencies in memory training studies
    Bjorklund, DF
    Miller, PH
    Coyle, TR
    Slawinski, JL
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 1997, 17 (04) : 411 - 441
  • [8] Development and evaluation of metacognition in early childhood education
    Chatzipanteli, Athanasia
    Grammatikopoulos, Vasilis
    Gregoriadis, Athanasios
    [J]. EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND CARE, 2014, 184 (08) : 1223 - 1232
  • [9] Young children's transfer of strategies: Utilization deficiencies, executive function, and metacognition
    Clerc, Jerome
    Miller, Patricia H.
    Cosnefroy, Laurent
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW, 2014, 34 (04) : 378 - 393
  • [10] What are the metacognitive costs of young children's overconfidence?
    Destan, Nesrin
    Roebers, Claudia M.
    [J]. METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2015, 10 (03) : 347 - 374