Bridging science and practice in conservation: Deficits and challenges from a research perspective

被引:20
|
作者
Farwig, Nina [1 ]
Ammer, Christian [2 ]
Annighoefer, Peter [2 ]
Baur, Bruno [3 ]
Behringer, David [4 ]
Diekoetter, Tim [5 ]
Hotes, Stefan [6 ]
Leyer, Ilona [7 ]
Mueller, Joerg [8 ]
Peter, Franziska [1 ]
Riecken, Uwe [9 ]
Bessel, Anne [1 ,4 ]
Thorn, Simon [8 ]
Werk, Klaus [10 ]
Ziegenhagen, Birgit [4 ]
机构
[1] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Conservat Ecol, Karl von Frisch Str 8, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Silviculture & Forest Ecol Temperate Zones, Busgenweg 1, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Basel, Sect Conservat Biol, St Johanns Vorstadt 10, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
[4] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Conservat Biol, Karl von Frisch Str 8, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
[5] Univ Kiel, Dept Landscape Ecol, Olshausenstr 75, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[6] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Anim Ecol, Karl von Frisch Str 8, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
[7] Geisenheim Univ, Dept Plant Ecol & Conservat, Von Lade Str 1, D-65366 Geisenheim, Germany
[8] Univ Wurzburg, Bioctr, Field Stn Fabrikschleichach, Glashuttenstr 5, D-96181 Rauhenebrach, Germany
[9] Fed Agcy Nat Conservat, Dept Habitat Protect & Landscape Ecol, Konstantinstr 110, D-53179 Bonn, Germany
[10] Geisenheim Univ, Dept Landscape Planning, Von Lade Str 1, D-65366 Geisenheim, Germany
关键词
Boundary institution; Communication platform; Knowledge exchange; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; POLICY INTERFACE; RESEARCH AGENDA; INDICATORS; RELEVANT; FORESTS; GROWTH; WASTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.baae.2017.08.007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Biodiversity is being lost at alarming rates in spite of efforts to conserve ecosystems, species and genetic diversity. There is broad consensus that biodiversity conservation needs to become more effective, and this requires an analysis of the causes that have prevented previous efforts from reaching their goal. A lack of knowledge exchange and cooperation between science and practice has been identified as a key issue in this context. Scientific knowledge frequently does not find its way into conservation practice, and information requirements by practitioners are often not considered appropriately by scientists. Here, we summarize deficits and challenges in the relationship between science and practice in conservation and outline approaches to achieving more effective knowledge exchange and collaboration at the interface between both. We propose that existing platforms for communication need to be complemented by independent institutions in particular at national and sub-national levels to facilitate successful co-production of knowledge as a prerequisite for effective conservation measures. (C) 2017 Gesellschaft fur Okologie. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Moving from decision to action in conservation science
    Wright, Alexander D.
    Bernard, Riley F.
    Mosher, Brittany A.
    O'Donnell, Katherine M.
    Braunagel, Taylor
    DiRenzo, Graziella, V
    Fleming, Jill
    Shafer, Charles
    Brand, Adrianne B.
    Zipkin, Elise F.
    Grant, Evan H. Campbell
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 249
  • [42] DISCUSSING CONSERVATION STRATEGY FROM AN ENVIRONMENTAL PERSPECTIVE
    Sosa, Beatriz
    Achkar, Marcel
    INTERCIENCIA, 2013, 38 (07) : 542 - 547
  • [43] Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: Two decades of progress and challenges between research and practice
    Izquierdo-Tort, Santiago
    Alatorre, Andrea
    Shapiro-Garza, Elizabeth
    Corbera, Esteve
    Deschamps-Lomeli, Jimena
    Avila-Foucat, Veronique Sophie
    Carabias, Julia
    Dupras, Jerome
    Kolinjivadi, Vijay
    Nunez, Juan Manuel
    Perevochtchikova, Maria
    Sims, Katharine
    Van Hecken, Gert
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2025, 73
  • [44] Biodiversity conservation research challenges in the 21st century: A review of publishing trends in 2000 and 2011
    Velasco, David
    Garcia-Llorente, Marina
    Alonso, Blanca
    Dolera, Agustin
    Palomo, Ignacio
    Iniesta-Arandia, Irene
    Martin-Lopez, Berta
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 54 : 90 - 96
  • [45] Sacred natural sites as other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMS) for biodiversity conservation in South Africa: Key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice
    Sinthumule, Ndidzulafhi Innocent
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2025, 86
  • [46] Biodiversity offsetting: what are the challenges, opportunities and research priorities for animal conservation?
    Evans, D. M.
    Altwegg, R.
    Garner, T. W. J.
    Gompper, M. E.
    Gordon, I. J.
    Johnson, J. A.
    Pettorelli, N.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 18 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [47] Seagrass ecosystem conservation in Southeast Asia needs to link science to policy and practice
    Fortes, Miguel D.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 159 : 51 - 56
  • [48] The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy
    Braat, Leon C.
    de Groot, Rudolf
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) : 4 - 15
  • [49] Freshwater science for the benefit of society: a perspective from early career researchers
    Brownlie, Will J.
    Woods, Helen J.
    Waters, Kate E.
    Moore, Alanna L.
    Bruce, Alannah M.
    Olszewska, Justyna P.
    Ives, Stephen C.
    INLAND WATERS, 2017, 7 (02) : 227 - 235
  • [50] Qualitative research in rehabilitation science: opportunities, challenges, and future directions
    VanderKaay, Sandra
    Moll, Sandra E.
    Gewurtz, Rebecca E.
    Jindal, Pranay
    Loyola-Sanchez, Adalberto
    Packham, Tara L.
    Lim, Chun Y.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (06) : 705 - 713