PROTOCOL: Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: An assessment of current methods

被引:4
作者
Young, Sarah [1 ]
Bethel, Alison [2 ]
Keenan, Ciara [3 ]
Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate [4 ]
Moreton, Elizabeth [5 ]
Pickup, David [6 ]
Premji, Zahra A. [7 ]
Rogers, Morwenna [8 ]
Viinholt, Bjorn C. A. [9 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Univ Lib, 4909 Frew St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula PenCLAHRC, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Queens Univ, Ctr Evidence & Social Innovat, Campbell UK & Ireland, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[4] Cornell Univ, Albert R Mann Lib, Ithaca, NY USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[6] Concordia Univ, Ctr Study Learning & Performance, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Lib & Cultural Resources, Calgary, AB, Canada
[8] Univ Exeter, Med Sch, Inst Hlth Res, NIHR PenCLAHRC, Exeter, Devon, England
[9] VIVE Danish Ctr Social Sci Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
JOURNALS;
D O I
10.1002/cl2.1208
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This is the protocol for a Campbell review. The aim of this study is to comprehensively assess the quality and nature of the search methods and reporting across Campbell systematic reviews. The search methods used in systematic reviews provide the foundation for establishing the body of literature from which conclusions are drawn and recommendations made. Searches should be comprehensive and reporting of search methods should be transparent and reproducible. Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews strive to adhere to the best methodological guidance available for this type of searching. The current work aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of the search methods and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews. Our specific objectives include the following: To examine how searches are currently conducted in Campbell systematic reviews. To identify any machine learning or automation methods used, or emerging and less commonly used approaches to web searching. To examine how search strategies, search methods and search reporting adhere to the Methodological Expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) and PRISMA guidelines. The findings will be used to identify opportunities for advancing current practices in Campbell reviews through updated guidance, peer review processes and author training and support.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Franco JVA, 2018, RES SYNTH METHODS, V9, P408, DOI [10.1002/jrsm.1302, 10.1007/978-3-319-65036-4_1]
  • [2] The search and selection for primary studies in systematic reviews published in dental journals indexed in MEDLINE was not fully reproducible
    Faggion, Clovis Mariano, Jr.
    Huivin, Raquel
    Aranda, Luisiana
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    Alarcon, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 98 : 53 - 61
  • [3] Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Koffel, Jonathan B.
    Rethlefsen, Melissa L.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [4] Kugley S., 2017, Campbell Systematic Reviews, V13, P1, DOI [DOI 10.4073/CMG.2016.1, 10.4073/cmg.2016.1, 10.4073/CMG.2016.1]
  • [5] The "quality" of JBI qualitative research synthesis: a methodological investigation into the adherence of meta-aggregative systematic reviews to reporting standards and methodological guidance
    Munn, Zachary
    Dias, Mafalda
    Tufanaru, Catalin
    Porritt, Kylie
    Stern, Cindy
    Jordan, Zoe
    Aromataris, Edoardo
    Pearson, Alan
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (05) : 1119 - 1139
  • [6] Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906]
  • [7] Transparency and Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Meta-Review
    Polanin, Joshua R.
    Hennessy, Emily A.
    Tsuji, Sho
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (04) : 1026 - 1041
  • [8] PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
    Rethlefsen, Melissa L.
    Kirtley, Shona
    Waffenschmidt, Siw
    Ayala, Ana Patricia
    Moher, David
    Page, Matthew J.
    Koffel, Jonathan B.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [9] The Campbell Collaboration, 2019, Campbell Policies and Guidelines Series, V4, DOI [10.4073/cpg.2016.4, DOI 10.4073/CPG.2016.4]
  • [10] Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines
    Toews, Lorraine C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2017, 105 (03) : 233 - 239