Risk assessment for the integrated energy system using a hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework

被引:21
作者
Xu, Fangqiu [1 ]
Gao, Kaiye [1 ]
Xiao, Bowen [2 ]
Liu, Jicheng [3 ,4 ]
Wu, Zixuan [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ, Sch Business Adm, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[3] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Xiamen Airlines, Digital Comm, Xiamen, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Risk assessment; Integrated energy system; HF-DEMATEL-CPT; Hesitant fuzzy sets; PROSPECT-THEORY; DEMATEL; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; IDENTIFICATION; SELECTION; PROJECTS; IMPACT; SETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.014
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The carbon neutrality target challenges the reliability of integrated energy system (IES) and therefore it is necessary to assess the comprehensive risk of IES projects for investors and managers. This work proposes a hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework to assess the risk of IES. In this framework, 16 risk factors are firstly identified from economy, technology, politics, society and management. Then, the HF-DEMATEL-CPT approach is proposed to assess the IES risk by combining the hesitant fuzzy sets (HFS), decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and cumulative prospect theory (CPT). Finally, a case is studied to analyze the risk factors of IES and assess the risks of four IES alternatives. The results show that there are 8 causal factors and 8 effect factors in IES risks and A3 is selected as the optimal solution. The sensitivity analysis is presented to prove the robustness of the result. Moreover, the proposed method is compared with other three risk assessment methods to show its superiority. Therefore, this study provides an effective and practical framework for IES risk assessment. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:7892 / 7907
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Development of an interval type-2 fuzzy sets based hierarchical MADM model by combining DEMATEL and TOPSIS [J].
Baykasoglu, Adil ;
Golcuk, Ilker .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 70 :37-51
[2]   Risk assessment of park-level integrated energy system considering uncertainty and dynamic correlation of energy prices [J].
Cao, Yan ;
Wang, Congshan ;
Mu, Yunfei ;
Jia, Hongjie ;
Yuan, Kai ;
Song, Yi .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 :451-459
[3]   Multi-objective optimization of an integrated energy system against energy, supply-demand matching and exergo-environmental cost over the whole life-cycle [J].
Chen, Yuzhu ;
Xu, Zhicheng ;
Wang, Jun ;
Lund, Peter D. ;
Han, Yifeng ;
Cheng, Tanghua .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 254
[4]   Explore and evaluate innovative value propositions for smart product service system: A novel graphics-based rough-fuzzy DEMATEL method [J].
Chen, Zhihua ;
Lu, Minglei ;
Ming, Xinguo ;
Zhang, Xianyu ;
Zhou, Tongtong .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 243
[5]   Exploring critical factors of green business failure based on Grey-Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) [J].
Cui, Li ;
Chan, Hing Kai ;
Zhou, Yizhuo ;
Dai, Jing ;
Lim, Jia Jia .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 98 :450-461
[6]   Energy investment risk assessment for nations along China's Belt & Road Initiative [J].
Duan, Fei ;
Ji, Qiang ;
Liu, Bing-Yue ;
Fan, Ying .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 170 :535-547
[7]   Renewable energy investment risk: An investigation of changes over time and the underlying drivers [J].
Egli, Florian .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 140
[8]   A series of score functions for hesitant fuzzy sets [J].
Farhadinia, B. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 277 :102-110
[9]   Effectiveness of the CVaR method in risk management in an integrated energy system [J].
Fu, Yu ;
Sun, Qie ;
Wennersten, Ronald .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 :1010-1015
[10]   Identification of dominant risk factor involved in spread of COVID-19 using hesitant fuzzy MCDM methodology [J].
Ghorui, Neha ;
Ghosh, Arijit ;
Mondal, Sankar Prasad ;
Bajuri, Mohd Yazid ;
Ahmadian, Ali ;
Salahshour, Soheil ;
Ferrara, Massimiliano .
RESULTS IN PHYSICS, 2021, 21