Green implementation of Lean Six Sigma projects in the manufacturing sector

被引:38
作者
Shokri, Alireza [1 ]
Li, Gendao [1 ]
机构
[1] Northumbria Univ, Fac Business & Law, Dept Business & Management, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Lean Six Sigma; Energy consumption; Green manufacturing; Environmental sustainability; Mathematical modelling; SUCCESS FACTORS; SUPPLY CHAIN; LOW-CARBON; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; QUALITY; IMPROVEMENT; SELECTION; COMPETITIVENESS; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1108/IJLSS-12-2018-0138
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose Historically, Lean Six Sigma (LSS) implementation has demonstrated a great deal of enhancement to process efficiency, profitability and customer satisfaction. The emerging market pressure for developing better quality, cheaper and greener products invokes a change of view in LSS economical effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to identify under which condition the final output of LSS projects with traditional strategic benefits are more environmentally friendly. Design/methodology/approach To investigate the choice of different types of LSS projects, the environmental impact under different conditions and the comparison of those conditions, the author developed an analytical mathematical model and analysed four different propositions. Findings The final price and production volume were recommended as mediating factors to leverage an LSS project to achieve a greener, customised and finance-oriented outputs. Originality/value This study uses a modelling approach to identify the conditions under which the actual methodology of the LSS project could be green via less energy consumption with consideration of expected LSS values and outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 729
页数:19
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   Critical success factors of Lean Six Sigma deployment: a current review [J].
Abu Bakar, Fairul Anwar ;
Subari, Khairanum ;
Daril, Mohd Amran Mohd .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2015, 6 (04) :339-348
[2]   Integrating Six Sigma with Quality Management Systems for The Development and Continuous Improvement of Higher Education Institutions [J].
Adina-Petruta, Pavel ;
Roxana, Sarbu .
3RD CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (CY-ICER 2014), 2014, 143 :643-648
[3]   Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review [J].
Albliwi, Saja ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Lim, Sarina ;
van der Wiele, Ton .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (09) :1012-1030
[4]   Jevons' paradox [J].
Alcott, B .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 54 (01) :9-21
[5]   Six Sigma performance for non-normal processes [J].
Aldowaisan, Tariq ;
Nourelfath, Mustapha ;
Hassan, Jawad .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 247 (03) :968-977
[6]  
Algassem F., 2014, American Academic Scholarly Research Journal, V6, P251
[7]   Lean Six Sigma and Innovation - an exploratory study among UK organisations [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Setijono, Djoko ;
Dahlgaard, Jens J. .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2016, 27 (1-2) :124-140
[8]   Readiness factors for the Lean Six Sigma journey in the higher education sector [J].
Antony, Jiju .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 63 (02) :257-+
[9]   The influence of challenging goals and structured method on Six Sigma project performance: A mediated moderation analysis [J].
Arumugam, V. ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Linderman, Kevin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 254 (01) :202-213
[10]  
Assarlind M, 2013, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V30, P387, DOI 10.1108/02656711311308385