Comparison of SynCardia total artificial heart and HeartWare HVAD biventricular support for management of biventricular heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing SynCardia total artificial heart (TAH) and biventricular HeartWare ventricular assist device (Bi-HVAD) support for biventricular heart failure (HF). Methods: Electronic search was performed to identify all relevant studies detailing patients who underwent biventricular assist device implantation using Bi-HVAD devices and those who underwent TAH placement for biventricular HF. Twelve studies including 512 patients in the TAH group versus 38 patients in the Bi-HVAD group were pooled for meta-analysis. Results: Ischemic cardiac etiology was present in 32% (95% CI, 24-47) of TAH vs. 15% (95% CI, 4-44) of Bi-HVAD patients (P=0.21). There was a comparable incidence of stroke [TAH 11% (95% CI, 7-16) vs. Bi-HVAD 13% (95% CI, 2-51), P=0.86] and acute kidney injury [TAH 28% (95% CI, 2-89) vs. Bi-HVAD 27% (95% CI, 9-59), P=0.98]. Overall infection rate was 67% (95% CI, 47-82) in TAH and 36% (95% CI, 10-74) in Bi-HVAD (P=0.16). Driveline infections were comparable between the two groups [TAH 11% (95% CI, 6-19) vs. Bi-HVAD 8% (95% CI, 1-39), P=0.73] and although a higher incidence of mediastinitis was found in the Bi-HVAD group [TAH 4% (95% CI, 2-7) vs. Bi-HVAD 15% (95% CI, 4-45), P=0.07] there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Postoperative bleeding was present in 42% (95% CI, 28-58) of TAH vs. 23% (95% CI, 8-52) of Bi-HVAD (P=0.22). Patients in the TAH group had shorter duration of support [TAH 71 days (95% CI, 15-127) vs. Bi- HVAD 167 days (95% CI, 116-217), P=0.01]. At the mean follow-up time of 120 days, (95% CI, 83-157) patients in both groups had similar overall mortality [TAH 36% (95% CI, 22-49) vs. Bi-HVAD 26% (95% CI, 6-46), P=0.44] including mortality on device support [TAH 26% (95% CI, 17-36) vs. Bi-HVAD 21% (95% CI, 4-37), P=0.55]. Discharge home on support was achieved in 6% (95% CI, 4-17%) of TAH patients vs. 73% (95% CI, 48-89%) of Bi-HVAD (P<0.01), and 68% (95% CI, 52-84) of TAH patients were transplanted vs. 61% (95% CI, 47-75) in the Bi-HVAD group (P=0.14). Conclusions: Patients on Bi-HVAD support were more likely to be able to be discharged home on support and had similar overall mortality to TAH, albeit with much longer duration of support.