How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients' views

被引:63
作者
Fuscaldo, Giuliana [1 ]
Russell, Sarah [2 ]
Gillam, Lynn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Res Matters, Fitzroy N, Vic 3068, Australia
关键词
frozen embryos; embryo donation; embryo disposition; embryo research; patient attitudes;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/dem325
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: In Victoria, Australia, legislation governing fertility treatment provides that surplus human embryos must not be stored for longer than 5 years. Couples must then choose one of three options: discard, donate to research or donate to another infertile couple. Previous research suggests that many people find these decisions difficult and emotionally distressing. This study aims to elucidate the nature of these difficulties and to identify ways in which the decision-making process could be facilitated. METHODS: This project used a combination of qualitative research methods. In total, 42 people agreed to participate in either a structured interview or a group discussion. All participants had completed IVF treatment and had surplus embryos in storage. The aim of the interviews was to discuss participants' decision making regarding their surplus embryos. Data were thematically analysed. RESULTS: Most participants described the decision-making process as difficult and emotional. Findings indicate that participants could be assisted by more information about each of their current options, and opportunities to talk to others in similar situations. Many responded positively to the idea of having more options, including choice about which research projects to donate to (directed research), and about the recipients of their donated embryos (directed donation). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there are practical ways to assist people in making decisions about their surplus embryos, which could be easily implemented. In addition, the study demonstrated interest in the possibility of directed donation to other couples.
引用
收藏
页码:3129 / 3138
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] Spare embryos: 3000 reasons to rethink the significance of genetic relatedness
    Fuscaldo, G
    Savulescu, J
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2005, 10 (02) : 164 - 168
  • [12] HAMMARBERG K, 2000, 16 ANN M EUR SOC HUM
  • [13] Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples' decisions and the factors influencing their choice
    Hammarberg, Karin
    Tinney, Leesa
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 (01) : 86 - 91
  • [14] Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research
    Hoffman, DI
    Zellman, GL
    Fair, CC
    Mayer, JF
    Zeitz, JG
    Gibbons, WE
    Turner, TG
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (05) : 1063 - 1069
  • [15] Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization in uncommon
    Hounshell, CV
    Chetkowski, RJ
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 66 (05) : 837 - 838
  • [16] The disposition of unused frozen embryos.
    Klock, SC
    Sheinin, S
    Kazer, RR
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (01) : 69 - 70
  • [17] Embryo donation at an Australian university in-vitro fertilisation clinic: issues and outcomes
    Kovacs, GT
    Breheny, SA
    Dear, MJ
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 178 (03) : 127 - 129
  • [18] PSYCHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION-EMBRYO TRANSFER PARTICIPANTS ATTITUDES TOWARD THE DESTINY OF THEIR SUPERNUMERARY EMBRYOS
    LARUELLE, C
    ENGLERT, Y
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1995, 63 (05) : 1047 - 1050
  • [19] 6 YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF CRYOPRESERVED HUMAN EMBRYOS
    LORNAGE, J
    CHORIER, H
    BOULIEU, D
    MATHIEU, C
    CZYBA, JC
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (10) : 2610 - 2616
  • [20] Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos
    Lyerly, Anne Drapkin
    Steinhauser, Karen
    Namey, Emily
    Tulsky, James A.
    Cook-Deegan, Robert
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    Walmer, David
    Faden, Ruth
    Wallach, Edward
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 85 (06) : 1623 - 1630