A Hesitant Fermatean Fuzzy CoCoSo Method for Group Decision-Making and an Application to Blockchain Platform Evaluation

被引:39
作者
Lai, Han [1 ,2 ]
Liao, Huchang [2 ]
Long, Yilu [2 ]
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Chongqing Key Lab Intelligent Percept & BlockChai, Chongqing 400067, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China
[3] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Inst Sustainable Construct, Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Multiple criteria group decision-making; Hesitant Fermatean fuzzy sets; Hesitant fuzzy sets; Fermatean fuzzy sets; CoCoSo; CRITERIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s40815-022-01319-7
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The existing score functions of Fermatean fuzzy number (FFN) show some defects. In addition, the evaluation information given by decision-makers in real decision-making processes may be several discrete values rather than single value, which cannot be represented by the classical Fermatean fuzzy set (FFS). The combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method can get a compromise solution by incorporating multi-aggregation strategy; however, the final aggregation operator adopted in the CoCoSo method may cause irrational results. To bridge the above gaps, in this study, we first determine a new score function of FFNs. Then, we define the hesitant Fermatean fuzzy sets based on hesitant fuzzy sets and FFSs to process uncertain information flexibly. Next, we develop an ensemble ranking approach to overcome the limitation of the original CoCoSo method regarding aggregation bias. Afterwards, we propose a hesitant Fermatean fuzzy CoCoSo method for multiple criteria group decision-making. Last, we verify its effectiveness and practicability through a case study on the selection of blockchain platform. At the same time, we perform sensitivity analysis to check the robustness of the method, and emphasize its advantages through comparative analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:2643 / 2661
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Evaluating the feasibility of blockchain in logistics operations: A decision framework [J].
Ar, Ilker Murat ;
Erol, Ismail ;
Peker, Iskender ;
Ozdemir, Ali ;
Medeni, Tunc Durmus ;
Medeni, Ihsan Tolga .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2020, 158
[2]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[3]   Joint blockchain service vendor-platform selection using social network relationships: A multi-provider multi-user decision perspective [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Zhu, Qingyun ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2021, 238
[4]   Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment [J].
Barberis, Nicholas C. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 27 (01) :173-195
[5]  
BUYUKOZKAN G, 2021, INFORM SCIENTIST
[6]   A multi-criteria evaluation model based on hesitant fuzzy sets for blockchain technology in supply chain management [J].
Colaka, Murat ;
Kaya, Ihsan ;
Ozkan, Betul ;
Budakc, Aysenur ;
Karasan, Ali .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 38 (01) :935-946
[7]   Regret theory: A new foundation [J].
Diecidue, Enrico ;
Somasundaram, Jeeva .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2017, 172 :88-119
[8]   Sustainability assessment of OPEC countries: Application of a multiple attribute decision making tool [J].
Ecer, Fatih ;
Pamucar, Dragan ;
Zolfani, Sarfaraz Hashemkhani ;
Eshkalag, Mahsa Keshavarz .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 241
[9]   Fuzzy DEMATEL analysis of barriers to Blockchain-based life cycle assessment in China [J].
Farooque, Muhammad ;
Jain, Vipul ;
Zhang, Abraham ;
Li, Zhi .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 147
[10]   NONLINEAR IMAGE RECOVERY WITH HALF-QUADRATIC REGULARIZATION [J].
GEMAN, D ;
YANG, CD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1995, 4 (07) :932-946