Safety and immunogenicity of two freeze-dried Vero cell rabies vaccines for human use in post-exposure prophylaxis

被引:18
作者
Wang Ling-yun [1 ]
Sun Mei-ping [1 ]
Zhang Xue-chun [1 ]
Suo Luo-dan [1 ]
Xu Ruo-hui [2 ]
Zou Yan-jie [3 ]
Zuo Li-bo [4 ]
Qi Hua [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Beijing 100013, Peoples R China
[2] Haidian Dist Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[3] Dongcheng Dist Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Beijing 100009, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Haidian Hosp, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
[5] Sixth Hosp Beijing, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
关键词
Freeze-dried Vero cell rabies vaccine for human use; Adverse reaction; Immunogenicity;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.053
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
To provide basis for human rabies vaccination in China, the safety and immunogenicity of two freeze-dried Vero cell rabies vaccines for human use were assessed. A total of 250 volunteers were enrolled and divided into two groups: volunteers in Group A (n = 200) were vaccinated five doses of Speeda Vero cell rabies vaccine manufactured by Liaoning Chengda Biotechnology Co. Ltd. on day 0, 3, 7, 14,28 after exposure. Volunteers in Group B (n = 50) were treated with Verorab Vero cell rabies vaccine manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur on the same schedule. The local and systematic adverse reactions were observed. Serum neutralizing antibody levels of 80 individuals in Group A and 50 individuals in Group B were tested with RFFIT on day 7, 14, 45, 180, 360 after the first dose. The seroconversion rates in Groups A and B were 40.3% and 37.0% on day 7 after the first dose, 95.5% and 97.7% on day 14, 100% and 100% on day 45, 100% and 100% on day 180, 89.1% and 89.5% on day 360 respectively, indicating no significant differences between the two groups. And no significant differences were found between the neutralizing antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) of the two groups on day 7, 14, 45, 180 and 360 after the first dose, with the GMTs of day 14, 45, 180 and 360 all higher than 0.5 IU/ml. Antibody levels of the two groups peaked around 2 weeks after the full vaccination program, followed by a 55% decrease up to day 180 and another 76% decrease up to day 360. Both groups experienced occasions of transient fever, rash, edema, and scleroma after vaccination. Neither group had any severe adverse reactions. It was concluded that both vaccines showed satisfactory safety and immunogenicity. Booster vaccination is recommended following another exposure after six months since the full vaccination program. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2679 / 2681
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, V82, P425
[2]   Immunogenicity and safety of a new Vero cell rabies vaccine produced using serum-free medium [J].
Costa, Wagner A. ;
Cunha, Ricardo S. ;
Bolzan, Vera Lucia ;
Silva, Andrea de Cassia R. ;
Caporale, Graciane Maria M. ;
Chaves, Luciana B. ;
Oselka, Gabriel W. ;
Junqueira, Dulce A. ;
Panachdo, Maria Rosana I. ;
Dias, Ricardo A. ;
Takaoka, Neide Y. .
VACCINE, 2007, 25 (48) :8140-8145
[3]  
DONG GM, 2006, CHIN J PREV MED, V7, P362
[4]   RISK-FACTORS FOR SYSTEMIC HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS AFTER BOOSTER VACCINATIONS WITH HUMAN-DIPLOID CELL RABIES VACCINE - A NATIONWIDE PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
FISHBEIN, DB ;
YENNE, KM ;
DREESEN, DW ;
TEPLIS, CF ;
MEHTA, N ;
BRIGGS, DJ .
VACCINE, 1993, 11 (14) :1390-1394
[5]  
Meslin FX, 1996, LAB TECHNIQUES RABIE, P7
[6]  
Smith J. S., 1996, P181
[7]  
STANLEY AP, 2008, VACCINES, P75
[8]   A SIMPLIFIED AND ECONOMICAL INTRADERMAL REGIMEN OF PURIFIED CHICK-EMBRYO CELL RABIES VACCINE FOR POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS [J].
SUNTHARASAMAI, P ;
CHAIPRASITHIKUL, P ;
WASI, C ;
SUPANARANOND, W ;
AUEWARAKUL, P ;
CHANTHAVANICH, P ;
SUPAPOCHANA, A ;
AREERAKSA, S ;
CHITTAMAS, S ;
JITTAPALAPONGSA, S ;
PITTISUTHITHAM, P ;
THONGCHAROEN, P .
VACCINE, 1994, 12 (06) :508-512
[9]  
Wang Ling-yun, 2008, Chinese Journal of Biologicals, V21, P1115
[10]  
*WHO, 2004, WHO TECHN REP SER, V931