Patient selection for later delivery timing with suspected previa-accreta

被引:20
作者
Perlman, Nicola C. [1 ]
Little, Sarah E. [1 ,2 ]
Thomas, Ann [2 ]
Cantonwine, David E. [1 ,2 ]
Carusi, Daniela A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Biol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Placenta accreta; placenta previa; preterm delivery; PLACENTA-ACCRETA; OUTCOMES; RISK; MANAGEMENT; INCRETA; PRETERM; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.13140
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionWe identified patients with previa and suspected accreta who are at lowest risk of unscheduled delivery or major morbidity with planned delivery beyond 34 weeks' gestation. Material and methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients who had reached 34.0 weeks' gestational age with a suspected previa-accreta. We evaluated rates of unscheduled and emergent delivery based on known risk factors for premature birth. In a second analysis, we stratified patients based on level of preoperative morbidity concern and evaluated rates of major transfusion and Intensive Care Unit admission by delivery week (34 weeks, 35 weeks or 36 weeks and beyond). ResultsOf 84 available patients, we classified 31 patients as low risk for unscheduled delivery and 52 as high risk. The low risk group was scheduled later (36.6 vs. 36.0 weeks; p < 0.01), but demonstrated lower rates of unscheduled delivery prior to 36 weeks (3% vs. 19%, p = 0.05). Of the patients with no prior cesarean section, only one (7%) experienced massive blood loss even though 36% had unscheduled deliveries. We observed no significant increase in major transfusion or massive blood loss with advancing gestational age, likely due to selection of the most concerning patients for early, scheduled delivery. ConclusionPatients with suspected previa-accreta and no risk factors for preterm birth are at low risk for an unscheduled delivery prior to 36 weeks. Those with no concern for percreta or increta or no prior cesarean section may also be candidates for later delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1028
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Accreta Placenta, 2012, OBSTET GYNECOL, V120, P207
[2]   Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Placenta Accreta After Institution of Team-Managed Care [J].
Al-Khan, Abdulla ;
Gupta, Vivek ;
Illsley, Nicholas P. ;
Mannion, Ciaran ;
Koenig, Christopher ;
Bogomol, Adam ;
Alvarez, Manuel ;
Zamudio, Stacy .
REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (06) :761-771
[3]   Placenta accreta and the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes [J].
Balayla, Jacques ;
Bondarenko, Helen Davis .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (02) :141-149
[4]   Placenta accreta [J].
Belfort, Michael A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (05) :430-439
[5]  
Bowman ZS, 2014, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V210, DOI [10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.044, 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.030]
[6]  
Bowman ZS, 2014, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V211, pe1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.AJ0G.2014.03.029.EPUB
[7]   Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy [J].
Comstock, CH ;
Love, JJ ;
Bronsteen, RA ;
Lee, W ;
Vettraino, IM ;
Huang, RR ;
Lorenz, RP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (04) :1135-1140
[8]   The morbidly adherent placenta: an overview of management options [J].
Doumouchtsis, Stergios K. ;
Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (09) :1126-1133
[9]   Placenta accreta: risk factors, perinatal outcomes, and consequences for subsequent births [J].
Eshkoli, Tamar ;
Weintraub, Adi Y. ;
Sergienko, Ruslan ;
Sheiner, Eyal .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (03) :219.e1-219.e7
[10]   The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population-based descriptive study [J].
Fitzpatrick, K. E. ;
Sellers, S. ;
Spark, P. ;
Kurinczuk, J. J. ;
Brocklehurst, P. ;
Knight, M. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (01) :62-71