The Computerized Test of Information Processing (CTIP) Offers an Alternative to the PASAT for Assessing Cognitive Processing Speed in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis

被引:19
作者
Tombaugh, Tom N. [1 ]
Berrigan, Lindsay I. [1 ]
Walker, Lisa A. S. [2 ]
Freedman, Mark S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Psychol, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
multiple sclerosis; information processing speed; Computerized Test of Information Processing; CTIP; PASAT; Adjusting-PASAT; SERIAL ADDITION TEST; REACTION-TIME; WORKING-MEMORY; ATTENTION; IMPAIRMENT; RECOVERY; DEFICIT; INJURY; MILD; TASK;
D O I
10.1097/WNN.0b013e3181cc8bd4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the ability of the Computerized Test of Information Processing (CTIP) to detect impaired cognitive processing speed in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with a traditional 3.0 second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and the Adjusting-PASAT which allows for calculation of a speed score. Background: A primary cognitive deficit in MS is an impaired ability to process information quickly. Unfortunately, relatively few clinical tests effectively measure information processing speed. Of these, the PASAT is generally acknowledged to be the most sensitive, but use of this test is constrained by several factors. Methods: All tests were administered to 30 adults with relapsing-remitting MS and 30 control participants. Results: A series of analysis of variances revealed MS participants performed significantly worse than controls on the CTIP and the 3.0 second PASAT, whereas no significant difference was observed for the Adjusting-PASAT. Conclusions: The results suggest the CTIP can detect deficits in the speed at which people with MS process information. Thus, the CTIP offers an alternative means to the 3.0 second PASAT included in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite for assessing such impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 198
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   Recovery versus retest effects in attention after closed head injury [J].
Spikman, JM ;
Timmerman, ME ;
van Zomeren, AH ;
Deelman, BG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 21 (05) :585-605
[32]  
Stuss D.T., 1994, Neuropsychology, V8, P316, DOI 10.1037/0894-4105.8.3.316
[33]  
Tombaugh T., 2008, Computerized Test of Information Processing
[34]   A comprehensive review of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) [J].
Tombaugh, TN .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 21 (01) :53-76
[35]   The effects of mild and severe traumatic brain injury on speed of information processing as measured by the computerized tests of information processing (CTIP) [J].
Tombaugh, Tom N. ;
Rees, Laura ;
Stormer, Peter ;
Harrison, Allyson G. ;
Smith, Andra .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 22 (01) :25-36
[36]   The effects of mild and severe traumatic brain injury on the auditory and visual versions of the Adjusting-Paced Serial Addition Test (Adjusting-PSAT) [J].
Tombaugh, Tom N. ;
Stormer, Peter ;
Rees, Laura ;
Irving, Susan ;
Francis, Margaret .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 21 (07) :753-761
[37]   LONG-TERM RECOVERY OF VISUAL REACTION-TIME AFTER CLOSED HEAD-INJURY [J].
VANZOMEREN, AH ;
DEELMAN, BG .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1978, 41 (05) :452-457
[38]  
Wechsler D., 2008, Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV), V4th ed, DOI [10.1037/t15169-000, DOI 10.1037/T15169-000]
[39]   Detecting simulation of attention deficits using reaction time tests [J].
Willison, J ;
Tombaugh, TN .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 21 (01) :41-52