The Computerized Test of Information Processing (CTIP) Offers an Alternative to the PASAT for Assessing Cognitive Processing Speed in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis

被引:19
作者
Tombaugh, Tom N. [1 ]
Berrigan, Lindsay I. [1 ]
Walker, Lisa A. S. [2 ]
Freedman, Mark S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Psychol, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
multiple sclerosis; information processing speed; Computerized Test of Information Processing; CTIP; PASAT; Adjusting-PASAT; SERIAL ADDITION TEST; REACTION-TIME; WORKING-MEMORY; ATTENTION; IMPAIRMENT; RECOVERY; DEFICIT; INJURY; MILD; TASK;
D O I
10.1097/WNN.0b013e3181cc8bd4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the ability of the Computerized Test of Information Processing (CTIP) to detect impaired cognitive processing speed in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) with a traditional 3.0 second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) and the Adjusting-PASAT which allows for calculation of a speed score. Background: A primary cognitive deficit in MS is an impaired ability to process information quickly. Unfortunately, relatively few clinical tests effectively measure information processing speed. Of these, the PASAT is generally acknowledged to be the most sensitive, but use of this test is constrained by several factors. Methods: All tests were administered to 30 adults with relapsing-remitting MS and 30 control participants. Results: A series of analysis of variances revealed MS participants performed significantly worse than controls on the CTIP and the 3.0 second PASAT, whereas no significant difference was observed for the Adjusting-PASAT. Conclusions: The results suggest the CTIP can detect deficits in the speed at which people with MS process information. Thus, the CTIP offers an alternative means to the 3.0 second PASAT included in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite for assessing such impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 198
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]  
Lezak MD, 2012, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL A
[22]   CATEGORY DOMINANCE, INSTANCE DOMINANCE, AND CATEGORIZATION TIME [J].
LOFTUS, EF .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 97 (01) :70-74
[23]  
MADIGAN NK, 2000, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V15, P944
[24]   PRACTICE EFFECTS WITH THE NIMH AIDS ABBREVIATED NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL BATTERY [J].
MCCAFFREY, RJ ;
COUSINS, JP ;
WESTERVELT, HJ ;
MARTYNOWICZ, M ;
REMICK, SC ;
SZEBENYI, S ;
WAGLE, WA ;
BOTTOMLEY, PA ;
HARDY, CJ ;
HAASE, RF .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 10 (03) :241-250
[25]   Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis [J].
McDonald, WI ;
Compston, A ;
Edan, G ;
Goodkin, D ;
Hartung, HP ;
Lublin, FD ;
McFarland, HF ;
Paty, DW ;
Polman, CH ;
Reingold, SC ;
Sandberg-Wollheim, M ;
Sibley, W ;
Thompson, AJ ;
van den Noort, S ;
Weinshenker, BY ;
Wolinsky, JS .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2001, 50 (01) :121-127
[27]   Reaction time: An alternative method for assessing the effects of multiple sclerosis on information processing speed [J].
Reicker, Lindsay I. ;
Tombaugh, Tom N. ;
Walker, Lisa ;
Freedman, Mark S. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 22 (05) :655-664
[28]  
Reitan R., 1985, HALSTEAD REITAN NEUR
[29]   Recommendations from the national multiple sclerosis society clinical outcomes assessment task force [J].
Rudick, R ;
Antel, J ;
Confavreux, C ;
Cutter, G ;
Ellison, G ;
Fischer, J ;
Lublin, F ;
Miller, A ;
Petkau, J ;
Rao, S ;
Reingold, S ;
Syndulko, K ;
Thompson, A ;
Wallenberg, J ;
Weinshenker, B ;
Willoughby, E .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1997, 42 (03) :379-382
[30]  
Schmidt J.P., 1995, The Learning and Memory Battery (LAMB)