Ultralow Cycle Fatigue Tests and Fracture Prediction Models for Duplex Stainless-Steel Devices of High Seismic Performance Braced Frames

被引:30
作者
Baiguera, Marco [1 ]
Vasdravellis, George [2 ]
Karavasilis, Theodore L. [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Civil Environm & Geomat Engn, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Heriot Watt Univ, Inst Infrastruct & Environm, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Southampton, Struct & Struct Mech, Fac Engn & Environm, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
HIGH-STRENGTH STEELS; VOID GROWTH-MODEL; OF-THE-ART; DUCTILE FRACTURE; ENERGY-DISSIPATION; STRUCTURAL-STEELS; SMCS CRITERION; STRESS STATES; STRAIN; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002243
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents ultralow cycle fatigue tests and the calibration of different fracture models for duplex stainless-steel devices of high seismic performance braced frames. Two different geometries of the devices were tested in full scale under 14 cyclic loading protocols up to fracture. The imposed protocols consisted of standard, constant-amplitude, and randomly generated loading histories. The test results show that the devices have stable hysteresis, high postyield stiffness, and large energy-dissipation and fracture capacities. Following the tests, two micromechanics-based models, i.e.,the cyclic void growth model and the built-in ABAQUS ductile fracture model, were calibrated using monotonic and cyclic tests on circumferentially notched coupons and complementary finite-element simulations. In addition, Coffin-Manson-like relationships were fitted to the results of the constant-amplitude tests of the devices, and the Palmgren-Miner's rule was used to predict fracture of the devices under the randomly generated loading protocols. Comparisons of the experimental and numerical results show that the calibrated models can predict ductile fracture of the devices due to ultralow cycle fatigue with acceptable accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, User Command-Language Manual
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 341 ANSIAISC
[3]  
[Anonymous], J STRUCT ENG ASCE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FRACTURE MECH FUNDAM
[5]   Dual seismic-resistant steel frame with high post-yield stiffness energy-dissipative braces for residual drift reduction [J].
Baiguera, Marco ;
Vasdravellis, George ;
Karavasilis, Theodore L. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2016, 122 :198-212
[6]   Modeling void coalescence during ductile fracture of a steel [J].
Bandstra, JP ;
Koss, DA ;
Geltmacher, A ;
Matic, P ;
Everett, RK .
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2004, 366 (02) :269-281
[7]   On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space [J].
Bao, YB ;
Wierzbicki, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 46 (01) :81-98
[8]  
Bridgman P.W., 1964, Studies in large plastic flow and fracture
[9]  
Bruneau M., 2011, Ductile design of steel structures, V2nd
[10]  
BSI (British Standards Institution), 2014, EN100883 BSI BS