Solid support or secret dissent? A list experiment on preference falsification during the Russian war against Ukraine1

被引:26
作者
Chapkovski, Philipp [1 ]
Schaub, Max [2 ]
机构
[1] WZB Berlin Social Sci Ctr, Reichpietschufer 50, D-10785 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Allende Pl 1, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Conflict; war; public opinion; preference falsification; list experiment; Russia; Ukraine; STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1177/20531680221108328
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Do individuals reveal their true preferences when asked for their support for an ongoing war? This research note presents the results of a list experiment implemented in the midst of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Our experiment allows us to estimate the extent of preference falsification with regard to support for the war by comparing the experimental results with a direct question. Our data comes from an online sample of 3000 Russians. Results show high levels of support for the war and significant levels of preference falsification: when asked directly, 71% of respondents support the war, while this share drops to 61% when using the list experiment. Preference falsification is particularly pronounced among individuals using TV as a main source of news. Our results imply that war leaders can pursue peace without fearing a large popular backlash, but also show that high levels of support for war can be sustained even once the brutality of the war has become clear.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Statistical Analysis of List Experiments [J].
Blair, Graeme ;
Imai, Kosuke .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (01) :47-77
[2]   The Statistical Analysis of Misreporting on Sensitive Survey Questions [J].
Eady, Gregory .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2017, 25 (02) :241-259
[3]   Threats, opportunity, and force: Repression and diversion of domestic pressure, 1948-1982 [J].
Enterline, AJ ;
Gleditsch, KS .
INTERNATIONAL INTERACTIONS, 2000, 26 (01) :21-53
[4]  
Kuran Timur., 1995, Private truth, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification
[5]  
Levada, 2022, MARCH, V31
[6]  
MacFarquhar N., 2022, NY TIMES
[7]  
Mullinix KJ., 2015, J EXPT POLITICAL SCI, V2, P109, DOI DOI 10.1017/XPS.2015.19
[8]   An Empirical Validation Study of Popular Survey Methodologies for Sensitive Questions [J].
Rosenfeld, Bryn ;
Imai, Kosuke ;
Shapiro, Jacob N. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 60 (03) :783-802
[9]  
Troianovski Anton., 2022, The New York Times