Additive influence on maximum experimental safe gap of ethylene-air mixtures

被引:23
作者
Razus, Domnina [1 ]
Mitu, Maria [1 ]
Giurcan, Venera [1 ]
Movileanu, Codina [1 ]
Oancea, Dumitru [2 ]
机构
[1] Romanian Acad, Ilie Murgulescu Inst Phys Chem, 202 Spl Independentei, Bucharest 060021, Romania
[2] Univ Bucharest, Dept Phys Chem, 4-12 Regina Elisabeta Blvd, Bucharest 030018, Romania
关键词
Ethylene; Explosion; Inert additive; Maximum experimental safe gap (MESG); baric coefficient; FLAME ARRESTERS; TURBULENT JET; PART; IGNITION; TRANSMISSION; EXPLOSION; GASES; TEMPERATURES; COMBUSTION; APPARATUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.071
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The maximum experimental safe gap (MESG) of ethylene-air mixtures diluted with inert gas (argon, nitrogen or carbon dioxide) were measured at variable inert mole fractions (0-0.4) and variable initial pressures (0.25-1.50 bar). The dependence of the maximum experimental safe gap on the total initial pressure, equivalence ratio and amount and nature of inert additive is discussed. The experimental maximum safe gaps were compared with MESG calculated from experimental quenching distances or from minimum ignition currents. For mixtures with constant composition the coefficients of MESG dependence on pressure were reported. The empirical correlation between MESG and the minimum ignition currents recommended in literature was reexamined using data measured for inert-diluted ethylene-air mixtures at various initial pressures. The results, especially from the range of pressures different from ambient, represent a useful characterization of inert-diluted ethylene-air mixtures, ready to be used for safety recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 894
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, 600791 IEC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, CHEMSAFE DAT REC SAF
  • [3] Is the Safe Performance of Flame Gaps in Flameproof Electrical Apparatus Deteriorated by Rusting and Mechanical Damage? Part 2: Group IIB and IIC Gases
    Arntzen, Bjorn J.
    Ringdal, Linn
    Steiner, Marianne
    Eckhoff, Rolf K.
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2014, 33 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [4] Power-to-Gas: Safety Characteristics of Hydrogen/Natural-Gas Mixtures
    Askar, Enis
    Schroeder, Volkmar
    Schuetz, Stefan
    Seemann, Albert
    [J]. 15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LOSS PREVENTION AND SAFETY PROMOTION (LOSS 2016), 2016, 48 : 397 - 402
  • [5] On ignition mechanisms of premixed CH4/air and H2/air using a hot turbulent jet generated by pre-chamber combustion
    Biswas, Sayan
    Tanvir, Saad
    Wang, Haifeng
    Qiao, Li
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 106 : 925 - 937
  • [6] Maximum experimental safe gap of binary and ternary mixtures
    Brandes, E
    Redeker, T
    [J]. JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE IV, 2002, 12 (PR7): : 207 - 213
  • [7] Brandes E., 2008, Safety Characteristic DataFlammable Liquids and Gases, V1
  • [8] Using maximum experimental safe gap to select flame arresters
    Britton, LG
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2000, 19 (03) : 140 - 145
  • [9] Davies M, 2013, CHEM ENG PROG, V109, P16
  • [10] THE MAXIMUM EXPERIMENTAL SAFE GAP - COMPARISON OF RESULTS FROM 8-LITRE AND 20-CM3 EXPLOSION VESSELS
    DICKIE, P
    LUNN, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1984, 8 (03) : 271 - 278