"Very easy, it's an English class, therefore they should not rely on a French text" English language teachers' beliefs regarding L1 use for literacy instruction

被引:5
作者
Payant, Caroline [1 ]
Bell, Philippa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Montreal, Dept Language Educ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
teachers' beliefs; plurilingualism; pedagogical translanguaging; literacy skills; English as an additional language; L1; use; young learners; low-proficiency learners; survey; L2; PLURILINGUALISM; SPEAKING; 1ST;
D O I
10.1075/ltyl.21004.pay
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In the context of additional language (AL) learning, teachers need to focus on the development of language proficiency as well as on high-level literacy skills, for example, comprehending and evaluating information and creating new meaning. From a plurilingual perspective, AL learners' first language (L1) is conceputalised as a useful tool in the development of target language proficiency; however, limited information exists concerning AL teachers' beliefs towards the use of the L1 for high-level literacy instruction despite its potential utility for complex skill development. The aim of the present exploratory study was to examine the beliefs of in-service teachers of English as an additional language (EAL) working in the Quebec primary and secondary school system in francophone Canada regarding plurilingual approaches for classroom literacy practices and to uncover the factors that influence their beliefs. An online survey was distributed to in-service EAL teachers (N = 57) working in the province of Quebec, Canada. Findings suggest that teachers believe that it is most beneficial to adopt a monolingual lens to literacy instruction, a belief that denies learners' use of their L1 and this, in a bilingual country. Implications for teacher education programs that challenge a monolingual lens are explored.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 170
页数:28
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1 LANGUAGE USE 2 FOR, DOI DOI 10.21832/9781847699909-004
[2]   Intersections of official and family language policy in Quebec [J].
Ballinger, Susan ;
Brouillard, Melanie ;
Ahooja, Alexa ;
Kircher, Ruth ;
Polka, Linda ;
Byers-Heinlein, Krista .
JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUAL AND MULTICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 43 (07) :614-628
[3]   Using L1 knowledge about language during L2 error correction: do students make cross-linguistic connections? [J].
Bell, Philippa ;
Fortier, Veronique ;
Gauvin, Isabelle .
LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2020, 29 (02) :95-113
[4]  
Borg S, 2011, ROUT HANDB APPL, P215
[5]   Evaluating the impact of Bill 101 on the English-speaking communities of Quebec [J].
Bourhis, Richard Y. .
LANGUAGE PROBLEMS & LANGUAGE PLANNING, 2019, 43 (02) :198-229
[6]   The Development of Plurilingual Education through Multimodal Narrative Reflection in Teacher Education: A Case Study of a Pre-Service Teacher's Beliefs about Language Education [J].
Cabre Rocafort, Miriam .
CANADIAN MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW-REVUE CANADIENNE DES LANGUES VIVANTES, 2019, 75 (01) :40-64
[7]   Pedagogical translanguaging: An introduction [J].
Cenoz, Jasone ;
Gorter, Durk .
SYSTEM, 2020, 92
[8]   Towards a Plurilingual Approach in English Language Teaching: Softening the Boundaries Between Languages [J].
Cenoz, Jasone ;
Gorter, Durk .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2013, 47 (03) :591-599
[9]  
Cenoz Jasone., 2015, Multilingual Education. Between language learning and translanguaging, P1
[10]  
Clark S, PRES QUEBECOIS DEUX