Landscape context and small-mammal abundance in a managed forest

被引:57
|
作者
Bowman, J
Forbes, G
Dilworth, T
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Biol, Ottawa, ON K15 5B6, Canada
[2] Univ New Brunswick, New Brunswick Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Fredericton, NB E3B 6E1, Canada
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Coll Agr Sci & Nat Resources, Dept Range Wildlife & Fisheries Management, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Blarina; Clethrionomys; forest management; Napaeozapus; Peromyscus; plantation; scale; small mammal;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00315-7
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We assessed whether small-mammal abundance was related to landscape context, when context was considered independently of within-stand vegetation and at different spatial extents. The study took place in an industrial forest in northwestern New Brunswick. Within-stand vegetation models explained 9-32% of the deviance in the abundance of individuals from the four most abundant species: red-backed voles, deer mice; short-tailed shrews: and woodland jumping mice. Landscape context was related to the distributions of two species: red-backed voles were less abundant within contexts of softwood plantations; and jumping mouse abundance was directly related to the amount of softwood forest. Variables measured at the largest radii of landscape context (500 m) were never significantly associated with the abundance of small mammals. Most species appeared robust to forest management with the exception of the negative relationship between red-backed voles and softwood plantations. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 255
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial scales of trapping in small-mammal research
    Bowman, J
    Corkum, CV
    Forbes, GJ
    CANADIAN FIELD-NATURALIST, 2001, 115 (03): : 472 - 475
  • [2] Small-mammal abundance differs between pipelines, edges, and interior boreal forest habitat
    Darling, A. F.
    Leston, L.
    Bayne, E. M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2019, 97 (10) : 880 - 894
  • [3] Mesic deciduous forest as patches of small-mammal richness within an Appalachian Mountain Forest
    McShea, WJ
    Pagels, J
    Orrock, J
    Harper, E
    Koy, K
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2003, 84 (02) : 627 - 643
  • [4] Effects of habitat on small-mammal diversity and abundance in West Virginia
    Osbourne, JD
    Anderson, JT
    Spurgeon, AB
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2005, 33 (03): : 814 - 822
  • [5] Small-mammal community structure in a South American deciduous Atlantic Forest
    Melo, G. L.
    Sponchiado, J.
    Machado, A. F.
    Caceres, N. C.
    COMMUNITY ECOLOGY, 2011, 12 (01) : 58 - 66
  • [6] Small-mammal seed predation limits the recruitment and abundance of two perennial grassland forbs
    Bricker, Mary
    Pearson, Dean
    Maron, John
    ECOLOGY, 2010, 91 (01) : 85 - 92
  • [7] Small mammal distribution on differently managed storm areas of a mountain forest
    Glitzner, I
    Gossow, H
    MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY, 2001, 66 (05) : 290 - 300
  • [8] WETLANDS AS RESERVOIRS OF SMALL-MAMMAL POPULATIONS IN THE NATAL DRAKENSBERG
    BOWLAND, JM
    PERRIN, MR
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 23 (02): : 39 - 43
  • [9] Small-mammal assemblage response to deforestation and afforestation in central China
    Raoul, Francis
    Pleydell, David
    Quere, Jean-Pierre
    Vaniscotte, Amelie
    Rieffel, Dominique
    Takahashi, Kenichi
    Bernard, Nadine
    Wang, Junli
    Dobigny, Taiana
    Galbreath, Kurt E.
    Giraudoux, Patrick
    MAMMALIA, 2008, 72 (04) : 320 - 332
  • [10] Reintroduced megaherbivores indirectly shape small-mammal responses to moonlight
    Guiden, P. W.
    Burke, Angela
    Fliginger, Jessica
    Rowland-Schaefer, Erin G.
    Savage, Kirstie
    Jones, Holly P.
    ECOLOGY, 2023, 104 (02)