Percutaneous coronary intervention in calcified stenoses: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Kristensen, Andreas Torp [1 ,2 ]
Jakobsen, Janus C. [3 ,4 ]
Olsen, Niels Thue [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Herlev, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Gentofte, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Ctr Clin Intervent Res, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Odense, Denmark
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 09期
关键词
Coronary intervention; Ischaemic heart disease; Myocardial infarction; ELUTING STENT IMPLANTATION; POOLED ANALYSIS; ROTATIONAL ATHERECTOMY; CALCIFICATION; LESIONS; IMPACT; INCONSISTENCY; PROGRESSION; OUTCOMES; CALCIUM;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063884
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Severely calcified coronary stenoses are difficult to treat with percutaneous coronary interventions. The presence of severe calcifications complicates lesion preparation, advancement of stents and achievement of full stent expansion. Intervention in these lesions is associated with an increased risk of complications and procedural failure compared with treatment of less calcified lesions. Due to the high burden of comorbidity, patients with severely calcified lesions are often excluded from interventional trials, and there is little evidence on how to treat these patients. Methods and analysis We will conduct a systematic review of randomised trials enrolling patients with calcified coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We will investigate any percutaneous treatment option including any lesion preparation, stenting or postdilatation technique. We will search The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Excerpta Medica database for studies from inception to 31 October 2022. The coprimary outcome is all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. If appropriate, we will conduct meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis. Ethics and dissemination No ethics approval is required for this study. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in this field. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021226034.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trial sequential analysis: Quality improvement for meta-analysis
    Maurya, Indubala
    Lohiya, Ayush
    Solanki, Ashish
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (12) : 1092 - 1094
  • [22] Incidence and risk factors of delirium after percutaneous coronary intervention in individuals hospitalised for acute myocardial infarction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Kaizhuang
    Lu, Jiaying
    Zhu, Yaoli
    Cheng, Tao
    Du, Dahao
    Qian, Xueqin
    Pan, Haiyan
    Wang, Xiaohua
    Yang, Hong
    Lou, Shaofei
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [23] The Racial Differences in the Clinical Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yan, Peng-Fei
    Liu, Li
    Yuan, Jing
    Xu, Chun-Xin
    Song, Dan
    Yan, Hua
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 203 : 193 - 202
  • [24] Level of sedation in critically ill adult patients: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Ceric, Ameldina
    Holgersson, Johan
    May, Teresa
    Skrifvars, Markus B.
    Haestbacka, Johanna
    Saxena, Manoj
    Aneman, Anders
    Delaney, Anthony
    Reade, Michael C.
    Delcourt, Candice
    Jakobsen, Janus
    Nielsen, Niklas
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [25] Comparison of different mobile health applications for intervention in children and adolescent with overweight: a protocol for systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Perego, Paolo
    Rashid, Rajeeb
    Gluud, Christian
    Jakobsen, Janus C.
    Andreoni, Giuseppe
    Lissau, Inge
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [26] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Hospital Volume and the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Tao, Hongbing
    Cai, Miao
    Liao, Aihua
    Cheng, Zhaohui
    Lin, Haifeng
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (05)
  • [27] Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cui, Chenmin
    Sheng, Zhichao
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 44 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [28] Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Allencherril, Joseph
    Hyman, Daniel
    Loya, Asad
    Jneid, Hani
    Alam, Mahboob
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 31 (08) : 199 - 203
  • [29] Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hamdi, Abdul Hafeez Ahmad
    Dali, Ahmad Fauzi
    Nuri, Thimarul Huda Mat
    Saleh, Muhammad Syafiq
    Ajmi, Noor Nabila
    Neoh, Chin Fen
    Ming, Long Chiau
    Abdullah, Amir Heberd
    Khan, Tahir Mehmood
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [30] Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
    Sandven, Irene
    Eritsland, Jan
    Abdelnoor, Michael
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 12 : 595 - 605