Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape

被引:73
作者
Codsi, Michael J. [5 ,6 ]
Bennetts, Craig [2 ,4 ]
Gordiev, Katherine [3 ]
Boeck, Daniel M. [8 ]
Kwon, Young [7 ]
Brems, John [3 ]
Powell, Kimerly [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Iannotti, Joseph P. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Whitaker Biomed Imaging Lab, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Orthopaed Res Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Dept Orthopaed, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[6] Everett Clin, Everett, WA, Australia
[7] New York Hosp Joint Dis, New York, NY USA
[8] LKH Feldkirch, Dept Traumatol, Feldkirch, Austria
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Current glenoid implants are designed to be secured to the articular surface. When the articular surface is compromised, a glenoid component could be implanted if it obtained fixation from the endosteal surface of the glenoid vault. The first step for designing such a glenoid implant is to define the normal three-dimensional anatomy of the glenoid vault. The purpose of this study was to define the variations in glenoid vault shape in a large group of cadaver scapula. Computed tomographic (CT) scans of 61 normal scapulae (mean, 25-34 years) from the Hamon-Todd Osteological Collection, with a wide range of sizes, were examined to define the normal glenoid vault anatomy. A custom software program was used to manipulate and measure the scans to determine the morphologic variations among the different glenoid vaults. From these data,, we defined a unique glenoid vault shape and empirically developed 5 sizes to represent the study population of the 61 scapulae. A second group of 11 cadaver scapulae were used to validate the shape defined using the other 61. Prototype implants were placed into the real 11 scapulae using standard surgical techniques and then CT-scanned to analyze the shape of the glenoid vault. In the 6 1 scapulae, 85% of the points defining the endosteal surfaces vary among scapulae by less than 2 mm. For each of the I I cadaver scapulae, the implant size used in the virtual computer implantation was the some size used for the plastic components placed into the cadaver scapulae. Fifty percent of the measured distances between the outer dimensions of the plastic models was within 2.4 mm of the glenoid endosteol surface. Eighty percent of the surface area of the plastic models was within 3.1 mm of the glenoid endosteal surface. Five percent of the dimensions were less than I mm and were considered to be areas of point contact. Before designing implants that can be used in pathologic glenoids, the shape of the normal glenoid vault must first be defined. This study defined a normal glenoid vault shape that can accommodate different sized scapula with 5 sizes. This glenoid shape may be used as a template to design a glenoid implant that obtains fixation within the glenoid vault.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 478
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
ANIUNA S, 2002, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V11, P637
[2]   Glenoid revision surgery after total shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Antuna, SA ;
Sperling, JW ;
Cofield, RH ;
Rowland, CM .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (03) :217-224
[3]   Variability of measurement of glenoid version on computed tomography scan [J].
Bokor, DJ ;
O'Sullivan, MD ;
Hazan, GJ .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1999, 8 (06) :595-598
[4]   EXCESSIVE RETROVERSION OF THE GLENOID CAVITY - A CAUSE OF NONTRAUMATIC POSTERIOR INSTABILITY OF THE SHOULDER [J].
BREWER, BJ ;
WUBBEN, RC ;
CARRERA, GF .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1986, 68A (05) :724-731
[5]   Glenoid size, inclination, and version: An anatomic study [J].
Churchill, RS ;
Brems, JJ ;
Kotschi, H .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (04) :327-332
[6]   In vivo characterization of glenoid with use of computed tomography [J].
Couteau, B ;
Mansat, P ;
Mansat, M ;
Darmana, R ;
Egan, J .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (02) :116-122
[7]   Morphological and mechanical analysis of the glenoid by 3D geometric reconstruction using computed tomography [J].
Couteau, B ;
Mansat, P ;
Darmana, R ;
Mansat, M ;
Egan, J .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 :S8-S12
[8]   THE USE OF COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE MEASUREMENT OF GLENOID VERSION [J].
FRIEDMAN, RJ ;
HAWTHORNE, KB ;
GENEZ, BM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (07) :1032-1037
[9]  
Hawkins RJ, 1999, ORTHOPEDICS, V22, P229
[10]   THE NORMAL GLENOHUMERAL RELATIONSHIPS - AN ANATOMICAL STUDY OF 140 SHOULDERS [J].
IANNOTTI, JP ;
GABRIEL, JP ;
SCHNECK, SL ;
EVANS, BG ;
MISRA, S .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (04) :491-500