Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity

被引:538
作者
Almanasreh, Enas [1 ]
Moles, Rebekah [1 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sydney Pharm Sch, N511,Pharm & Bank Bldg A15, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Content validity; Instrument development; Validity; Methodological research; Health and social science research; CRITICAL-VALUES; INSTRUMENT; CONSTRUCT;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The assessment of content validity is a critical and complex step in the development process of instruments which are frequently used to measure complex constructs in social and administrative pharmacy research. The aims of this study were to investigate the elements of content validity; to describe a practical approach for assessing content validity; and to discuss existing content validity indices. This is a narrative review of the assessment and quantification of content validity. It describes the key stages of conducting the content validation study and discusses the quantification and evaluation of the content validity estimates. Content validity provides evidence about the degree to which elements of an assessment instrument are relevant to and representative of the targeted construct for a particular assessment purpose. The assessment of content validity relies on using a panel of experts to evaluate instrument elements and rate them based on their relevance and representativeness to the content domain. It is a three-stage process that includes; the development stage, judgment and quantifying stage, and revising and reconstruction stage. To quantify the expert judgments, several indices have been discussed in this paper such as the content validity ratio (CVR), content validity index (CVI), modified-Kappa, and some agreement indices. A practical guide describes the process of content validity evaluation is provided. In summary, content validation processes and content validity indices are essential factors in the instrument development process, should be treated and reported as important as other types of construct validation. Determining item CVI and reporting an overall CVI are important components necessary to instruments especially when the instrument is used to measure health outcomes or to guide a clinical decision making. Content validity deserves a rigorous assessment process as the obtained information from this process are invaluable for the quality of the newly developed instrument.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 221
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, AM J MED, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.AMJMED.2005.10.036
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, RELIABILITY VALIDITY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for industry: Patient-Reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HDB TEST DEV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, HLTH MEASUREMENT SCA
[6]   Critical Values for Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation [J].
Ayre, Colin ;
Scally, Andrew John .
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 47 (01) :79-86
[7]  
Beck CT, 1999, J NURS EDUC, V38, P133
[8]  
Bernstein Nunnally J., 1994, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY, V1994
[9]  
Cronbach L.J., 1971, Educational Measurement, P443, DOI DOI 10.1037/14353-009
[10]  
Davis A.J., 1992, APPL NURS RES, V5, P104, DOI [10.1016/S0897-1897, DOI 10.1016/S0897-1897, DOI 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4]