On the concepts of dose-mean lineal energy, unrestricted and restricted dose-averaged LET in proton therapy

被引:15
作者
Bertolet, A. [1 ,2 ]
Cortes-Giraldo, M. A. [2 ]
Carabe-Fernandez, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Seville, Dept Atom Mol & Nucl Phys, Seville, Spain
关键词
microdosimetry; LET; lineal energy; proton therapy; y (D) calculation; restricted LET; LETd calculation; RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; MICRODOSIMETRIC-KINETIC MODEL; MONTE-CARLO; CELL-SURVIVAL; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ab730a
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
To calculate 3D distributions of microdosimetric-based restricted dose-averaged LET (LETd) and dose-mean lineal energy () in order to explore their similarities and differences between each other and with the traditional unrestricted LETd. Additionally, a new expression for optimum restricted LETd calculation is derived, allowing for disregarding straggling-associated functions in the classical microdosimetric theory. Restricted LETd and for polyenergetic beams can be obtained by integrating previously developed energy-dependent microdosimetric functions over the energetic spectrum of these beams. This calculation is extended to the entire calculation volume using an algorithm to determine spectral fluence. Equivalently, unrestricted LETd can be obtained integrating the stopping power curve on the spectrum. A new expression to calculate restricted LETd is also derived. Results for traditional and new formulas are compared for a clinical 100 MeV proton beam. Distributions of unrestricted LETd, restricted LETd and are analyzed for a prostate case, for microscopic spherical sites of 1 mu m and 10 mu m in diameter. Traditional and new expressions for restricted LETd remarkably agree, being the mean differences 0.05 +/- 0.04 keV mu m(-1) for the 1 mu m site and 0.05 +/- 0.02 keV mu m(-1) for the 10 mu m site. In the prostate case, the ratio between the maximum and the central value for central axis (CAX) profiles is around 2 for all the quantities, being the highest for restricted LETd for 1 mu m (2.17) and the lowest for for 1 mu m (1.78). Unrestricted LETd, restricted LETd and can be analytically computed and compared for clinical plans. Two important consequences of the calculation of are: (1) its distribution can be verified by directly measuring it in clinical beams; and (2), optimization of proton treatments based on these quantities is enabled as well as future developments of RBE models based on them.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
An Y, 2017, MED PHYS, V44, P28, DOI [10.1002/mp.12610, 10.1002/mp.12001]
[2]   A kernel-based algorithm for the spectral fluence of clinical proton beams to calculate dose-averaged LET and other dosimetric quantities of interest [J].
Bertolet, A. ;
Cortes-Giraldo, M. A. ;
Souris, K. ;
Carabe, A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) :2495-2505
[3]   Dose-averaged LET calculation for proton track segments using microdosimetric Monte Carlo simulations [J].
Bertolet, A. ;
Baratto-Roldan, A. ;
Barbieri, S. ;
Baiocco, G. ;
Carabe, A. ;
Cortes-Giraldo, M. A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (09) :4184-4192
[4]   Segment-averaged LET concept and analytical calculation from microdosimetric quantities in proton radiation therapy [J].
Bertolet, A. ;
Baratto-Roldan, A. ;
Cortes-Giraldo, M. A. ;
Carabe-Fernandez, A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (09) :4204-4214
[5]   Calculation of clinical dose distributions in proton therapy from microdosimetry [J].
Bertolet, Alejandro ;
Antonio Cortes-Giraldo, Miguel ;
Souris, Kevin ;
Cohilis, Marie ;
Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (12) :5816-5823
[6]   Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization [J].
Cao, Wenhua ;
Khabazian, Azin ;
Yepes, Pablo P. ;
Lim, Gino ;
Poenisch, Falk ;
Grosshans, David R. ;
Mohan, Radhe .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (01)
[7]   A critical study of different Monte Carlo scoring methods of dose average linear-energy-transfer maps calculated in voxelized geometries irradiated with clinical proton beams [J].
Cortes-Giraldo, M. A. ;
Carabe, A. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (07) :2645-2669
[8]   Hybrid 3D analytical linear energy transfer calculation algorithm based on precalculated data from Monte Carlo simulations [J].
Deng, Wei ;
Ding, Xiaoning ;
Younkin, James E. ;
Shen, Jiajian ;
Bues, Martin ;
Schild, Steven E. ;
Patel, Samir H. ;
Liu, Wei .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (02) :745-752
[9]   Linear Energy Transfer Painting With Proton Therapy: A Means of Reducing Radiation Doses With Equivalent Clinical Effectiveness [J].
Fager, Marcus ;
Toma-Dasu, Iuliana ;
Kirk, Maura ;
Dolney, Derek ;
Diffenderfer, Eric S. ;
Vapiwala, Neha ;
Carabe, Alejandro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 91 (05) :1057-1064
[10]   Linear Energy Transfer-Guided Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy: Feasibility Study and Clinical Potential [J].
Giantsoudi, Drosoula ;
Grassberger, Clemens ;
Craft, David ;
Niemierko, Andrzej ;
Trofimov, Alexei ;
Paganetti, Harald .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (01) :216-222