Intraoperative bypass flow measurement reduces the incidence of postoperative ventricular fibrillation and myocardial markers after coronary revascularisation

被引:10
作者
Bauer, SF [1 ]
Bauer, K [1 ]
Ennker, IC [1 ]
Rosendahl, U [1 ]
Ennker, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Heart Inst Lahr Baden, D-77933 Lahr, Germany
关键词
bypass flow measurement; CABG; myocardial infarction; ventricular fibrillation; quality in bypass surgery;
D O I
10.1055/s-2005-837642
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Sudden ventricular fibrillation (VF) and myocardial infarction (MI) are life-threatening complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We prospectively analysed the impact of intraciperative bypass flow measurement with the transit time flow Doppler method (TTFD) on the incidence and outcome of postoperative VF and MI. Methods: In 1995 a standardized algorithm for the treatment of postoperative VF was introduced in our institution. The rate of postoperative VF was therefore exactly registered. In 1998 the TTFD method was implemented as a standard in all CABG cases. Whenever insufficient bypass graft flow was detected, anastomoses were redone and technical problems affecting the grafts were excluded. The incidence of postoperative VF and CK/CK-MB fraction was observed prospectively and the new data was compared to the data from 1995 to 1998. Results: From 1/95 to 7/98 a total of 4321 patients (group A) were operated on with isolated CABG procedures using extracorporeal circulation. In the period from 8/98 to 10/02 a total of 3421 patients (group B) was operated on with isolated CABG procedures under the same conditions, except that the TTFD method was used in every case. The treatment of VF was standardised in both groups according to the algorithm. The most striking effect was the significant reduction of VF from 0.66% to 0.44% when TTFD was introduced and the steep decrease in mortality from 30% to 12.2% in patients with VF when the algorithm and TTFD were routinely applied. Furthermore the rate of insufficient bypass flow detected by angiography was reduced by 66%. Conclusion: Routinely the use of TTFD significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative VF, postoperative CK/CK-MB fraction, and angiographically detected bypass malfunction. A simultaneously implemented algorithm reduced the mortality with VF after CABG. The consequent use of TTFD intraoperatively reduced the incidence of postoperative anastomosis and technically related complications of bypass surgery and led to a significant reduction of postoperative mortality in CABG procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 222
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Bardell T, 2002, CAN MED ASSOC J, V167, P783
[2]  
Belboul A, 1999, SCAND CARDIOVASC J, V33, P23
[3]  
CAPUTO M, 1999, EUR J CARDIOVASC SUR, V14, P596
[4]   Troponin levels in patients with myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
Carrier, M ;
Pellerin, M ;
Perrault, LP ;
Solymoss, BC ;
Pelletier, LC .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 69 (02) :435-440
[5]   Preoperative angiography and intraoperative transit time flow measurement to detect coronary graft patency in reoperations: An integrated approach - A case report [J].
D'Ancona, G ;
Karamanoukian, H ;
Ricci, M ;
Bergsland, J ;
Salerno, TA .
ANGIOLOGY, 2000, 51 (09) :777-780
[6]   Graft revision after transit time flow measurement in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
D'Ancona, G ;
Karamanoukian, HL ;
Ricci, M ;
Schmid, S ;
Bergsland, J ;
Salerno, TA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 17 (03) :287-293
[7]  
FRASSEN EJ, 2002, CHEST, V122, P1316
[8]   Can visual assessment of flow waveform morphology detect anastomotic error in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? [J].
Jaber, SF ;
Koenig, SC ;
BhaskerRao, B ;
VanHimbergen, DJ ;
Spence, PA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 14 (05) :476-479
[9]  
KAUL TK, 1999, EUR J CARDIOVASC SUR, V13, P629
[10]   Intraoperative evaluation of coronary anastomosis by transit-time ultrasonic flow measurement [J].
Morota, T ;
Duhaylongsod, FG ;
Burfeind, WR ;
Huang, CT .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (05) :1446-1450