Impact of biological sex on the outcomes of spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain

被引:8
|
作者
Mekhail, Nagy [1 ]
Costandi, Shrif [1 ]
Saweris, Youssef [1 ]
Armanyous, Sherif [1 ]
Chauhan, Gaurav [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Evidence Based Pain Management Res, C25,9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr UPMC, Pain Med Program, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
efficacy of spinal cord stimulator; neuromodulation; outcomes of SCS; spinal cord stimulation; SCS and biological sex; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CHRONIC BACK; GONADAL-HORMONES; SURGERY; PREDICTORS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/papr.13097
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) continues to gain increasing popularity in the pain management field for the treatment of different painful conditions; however, to-date, the correlation between the SCS effectiveness and biological sex has not been fully established. We aimed to investigate the correlation between the biological sex and SCS outcomes. Methods Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective cohort study was performed by collecting data for patients treated with SCS at a tertiary academic center between the years 2002 and 2019. Data was assessed with multivariable linear regression to investigate the association between biological sex and pain scores at baseline, 6-, and 12- months following SCS implantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on a set of covariates including age, duration of pain, time since implant, BMI, opioid medications use, smoking, depression and history of alcohol, or substance abuse. Results Of the patients treated with SCS implants, 418 patients fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria, out of which the majority were females (272, 65%). The pre-matching data reported a significant difference in history of diabetes and depression and was also significant for greater opioid use in male patients at baseline, 6-, and 12-months post-SCS implant. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on the above mentioned covariant. After matching, no statistical difference was found among the variables, in both groups. Furthermore, after matching no significant differences in the pain scores at baseline, 6-, and 12-months post-SCS implant were observed. Conclusion No biological sex-based differences in the analgesic response to SCS therapy was detected at 6- and 12-months post-SCS implant between groups with similar demographics, biomedical, and psychological values.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 439
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative Sensory Testing of Spinal Cord and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Chronic Pain Patients
    Sankarasubramanian, Vishwanath
    Chiravuri, Srinivas
    Mirzakhalili, Ehsan
    Anaya, Carlos J.
    Scott, John Ryan
    Brummett, Chad M.
    Clauw, Daniel J.
    Patil, Parag G.
    Harte, Steven E.
    Lempka, Scott F.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (04): : 672 - 684
  • [42] Machine Learning in Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain
    Hariharan, Varun
    Harland, Tessa A.
    Young, Christopher
    Sagar, Amit
    Gomez, Maria Merlano
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 25 (02) : 112 - 116
  • [43] Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Indications and Patient Selection
    Nagel, Sean J.
    Lempka, Scott F.
    Machado, Andre G.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (04) : 723 - +
  • [44] Neurostimulation technology for the treatment of chronic pain: a focus on spinal cord stimulation
    Foletti, Antonio
    Durrer, Anne
    Buchser, Eric
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2007, 4 (02) : 201 - 214
  • [45] Clinical outcomes of spinal cord stimulation in patients with intractable leg pain in Japan
    Ueno, Keisuke
    Tachibana, Koichi
    Masunaga, Nobutaka
    Shinoda, Yukinori
    Minamisaka, Tomoko
    Inui, Hirooki
    Amiya, Ryohei
    Inoue, Soki
    Murakami, Arisa
    Hoshida, Shiro
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2024, 24 (06) : 826 - 831
  • [46] Spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain in peripheral neuropathy
    Kumar, K
    Toth, C
    Nath, RK
    SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1996, 46 (04): : 363 - 369
  • [47] EFFECTS OF SPINAL CORD STIMULATION ON HEART RATE VARIABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN
    Kalmar, Zsuzsanna
    Kovacs, Norbert
    Balas, Istvan
    Perlaki, Gabor
    Plozer, Eniko
    Orsi, Gergely
    Altbacker, Anna
    Schwarcz, Attila
    Hejjel, Laszlo
    Komoly, Samuel
    Janszky, Jozsef
    IDEGGYOGYASZATI SZEMLE-CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 66 (3-4): : 102 - 106
  • [48] Improved physical activity in patients treated for chronic pain by spinal cord stimulation
    Buchser, E
    Paraschiv-Ionescu, A
    Durrer, A
    Depierraz, B
    Aminian, K
    Najafi, B
    Rutschmann, B
    NEUROMODULATION, 2005, 8 (01): : 40 - 48
  • [49] Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: technical advances
    Isagulyan, Emil
    Slavin, Konstantin
    Konovalov, Nikolay
    Dorochov, Eugeny
    Tomsky, Alexey
    Dekopov, Andrey
    Makashova, Elizaveta
    Isagulyan, David
    Genov, Pavel
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 33 (02) : 99 - 107
  • [50] Spinal cord stimulation - a long-term evaluation in patients with chronic pain
    Kay, AD
    McIntyre, MD
    Macrae, WA
    Varma, TRK
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 15 (04) : 335 - 341