Impact of biological sex on the outcomes of spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain

被引:8
|
作者
Mekhail, Nagy [1 ]
Costandi, Shrif [1 ]
Saweris, Youssef [1 ]
Armanyous, Sherif [1 ]
Chauhan, Gaurav [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Evidence Based Pain Management Res, C25,9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr UPMC, Pain Med Program, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
efficacy of spinal cord stimulator; neuromodulation; outcomes of SCS; spinal cord stimulation; SCS and biological sex; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CHRONIC BACK; GONADAL-HORMONES; SURGERY; PREDICTORS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/papr.13097
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) continues to gain increasing popularity in the pain management field for the treatment of different painful conditions; however, to-date, the correlation between the SCS effectiveness and biological sex has not been fully established. We aimed to investigate the correlation between the biological sex and SCS outcomes. Methods Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective cohort study was performed by collecting data for patients treated with SCS at a tertiary academic center between the years 2002 and 2019. Data was assessed with multivariable linear regression to investigate the association between biological sex and pain scores at baseline, 6-, and 12- months following SCS implantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on a set of covariates including age, duration of pain, time since implant, BMI, opioid medications use, smoking, depression and history of alcohol, or substance abuse. Results Of the patients treated with SCS implants, 418 patients fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria, out of which the majority were females (272, 65%). The pre-matching data reported a significant difference in history of diabetes and depression and was also significant for greater opioid use in male patients at baseline, 6-, and 12-months post-SCS implant. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed based on the above mentioned covariant. After matching, no statistical difference was found among the variables, in both groups. Furthermore, after matching no significant differences in the pain scores at baseline, 6-, and 12-months post-SCS implant were observed. Conclusion No biological sex-based differences in the analgesic response to SCS therapy was detected at 6- and 12-months post-SCS implant between groups with similar demographics, biomedical, and psychological values.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 439
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Defining minimal clinically important differences in pain and disability outcomes of patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord stimulation
    Sabourin, Shelby
    Tram, Justin
    Sheldon, Breanna L.
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (02) : 243 - 250
  • [32] The Choice of Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Targeted Drug Delivery in the Management of Chronic Pain: Validation of an Outcomes Predictive Formula
    Mekhail, Nagy
    Armanyous, Sherif
    Templeton, Erin
    Prayson, Nicholas
    Saweris, Youssef
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (06): : 1218 - 1225
  • [33] Spinal cord stimulation: Subjective pain intensity and presurgical correlates in chronic pain patients
    Sumner, Lekeisha A.
    Lofland, Kenneth
    CHRONIC ILLNESS, 2014, 10 (03) : 157 - 166
  • [34] Health-Care Utilization and Outcomes with 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Refractory Pain
    Gupta, Mayank
    Ray, Mahoua
    Ladesich, Nicole
    Gupta, Akshat
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 3675 - 3683
  • [35] Core patient-reported outcome measures for chronic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation or dorsal root ganglia stimulation
    Huygen, Frank
    Hagedorn, Jonathan M.
    Falowski, Steven
    Schultz, David
    Vesper, Jan
    Heros, Robert D.
    Patterson, Denis G.
    Dehghan, Soroush
    Ross, Erika
    Kyani, Anahita
    Mansouri, Misagh B.
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [36] High-Resolution Spinal Motor Mapping Using Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Pain
    Telkes, Ilknur
    Hadanny, Amir
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Chitnis, Girish
    Paniccioli, Steven
    O'Connor, Katherine
    Grey, Rachael
    McCarthy, Kevin
    Khazen, Olga
    McLaughlin, Bryan
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 91 (03) : 459 - 469
  • [37] Clinical Outcomes after Spinal Cord Stimulation According to Pain Characteristics
    Ha, Jong-Ho
    Huh, Ryoong
    Kim, Shin-Gyeom
    Im, Soo-Bin
    Jeong, Je Hoon
    Hwang, Sun-Chul
    Shin, Dong-Seong
    Kim, Bum-Tae
    Chung, Moonyoung
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 65 (02) : 276 - 286
  • [38] A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain
    Verrills, Paul
    Sinclair, Chantelle
    Barnard, Adele
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 9 : 481 - 492
  • [39] Advances in Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Pain
    Jung J.H.
    Ignatius M.I.
    Schulz C.F.
    Ornelas C.C.
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 2013, 1 (2) : 120 - 124
  • [40] Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for the Treatment of Chronic Pain
    Chitneni, Ahish
    Jain, Esha
    Sahni, Sidharth
    Mavrocordatos, Philippe
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2024, 28 (07) : 595 - 605