Experiences and interactions with treatment staff: reactions from state prison inmates

被引:6
作者
Antonio, Michael E. [1 ]
Price, Selena R. [2 ]
机构
[1] West Chester Univ, Dept Criminal Justice, W Chester, PA 19383 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Criminal Justice, State Coll, PA USA
关键词
gender-specific; inmates; interactions; offender rehabilitation; treatment staff; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; PERCEPTIONS; ATTITUDES; CARE;
D O I
10.1080/10509674.2021.1966155
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Incarceration should allow inmates an opportunity for rehabilitation and correcting their criminal thinking and inappropriate behavior that contributed to their imprisonment. The current study gathered data from a Prison Culture Questionnaire administered to inmates from a state correctional system. The analysis examined inmates' perceptions of treatment staff who were employed in the prison. This was an exploratory analysis. Overall, responses to Likert-scale items revealed that inmates believed treatment staff were fair, polite, respectful, helpful, good communicators, interested in listening to their concerns, understood living in prison was stressful, and had a good working relationship with them; however, they were undecided about whether treatment staff showed compassion, could reduce conflict, enforced rules consistently, were good role models, explained their decision making, cared about the impact of their behavior, or valued inmates as human beings. Also, findings from a content analysis revealed five broad themes about inmates' experiences and interactions with treatment staff (competent professionals, critical and inappropriate, respectful, minimal contact, and hybrid/mixed responses). Responses provided by male and female inmates about their experiences and interactions with treatment staff were similar; however, several gender-specific findings were uncovered. A narrative compiling the most comprehensive inmate responses is shown.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 443
页数:21
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Antonio M E., 2020, Corrections, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/23774657.2020.1810173, 10.1080/23774657.2020.1810173]
[2]   The effects of tenure on staff apathy and treatment orientation: A comparison of respondent characteristics and environmental factors [J].
Antonio M.E. ;
Young J.L. .
American Journal of Criminal Justice, 2011, 36 (1) :1-16
[3]   Reinforcing Positive Behavior in a Prison: Whose Responsibility Is It? [J].
Antonio, Michael ;
Young, Jacqueline ;
Wingeard, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION, 2009, 48 (01) :53-66
[4]   Evaluating the Effectiveness of the National Curriculum and Training Institute's "Cognitive Life Skills" Program among Parolees Supervised by Pennsylvania's Board of Probation & Parole [J].
Antonio, Michael E. ;
Crossett, Andrew .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2017, 42 (03) :514-532
[5]   Procedural Justice in Prison: The Importance of Staff Characteristics [J].
Beijersbergen, Karin A. ;
Dirkzwager, Anja J. E. ;
Molleman, Toon ;
van der Laan, Peter H. ;
Nieuwbeerta, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2015, 59 (04) :337-358
[6]   When Boundaries are Broken: Inmate Perceptions of Correctional Staff Boundary Violations [J].
Blackburn, Ashley G. ;
Fowler, Shannon K. ;
Mullings, Janet L. ;
Marquart, James W. .
DEVIANT BEHAVIOR, 2011, 32 (04) :351-378
[7]  
Bonta J., 1995, FORUM CORRECTIONS RE, V7, P34
[8]  
Bottoms A, 2012, J CRIM LAW CRIM, V102, P119
[9]  
Bray B., 2018, Counseling Today, V60, P22
[10]  
Butler M., 2007, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, V46, P115, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2311.2007.00460.X