Trifocal versus Bifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens Implantation after Cataract Surgery or Refractive Lens Exchange: a Meta-analysis

被引:21
作者
Yoon, Chang Ho [1 ,2 ]
Shin, In-Soo [3 ]
Kim, Mee Kum [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Coll Med, 103 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Seoul Artificial Eye Ctr, Lab Ocular Regenerat Med & Immunol, Biomed Res Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Jeonju Univ, Dept Educ, Coll Educ, Jeonju, South Korea
关键词
Bifocal; Diffractive; Intraocular Lens; Meta-analysis; Trifocal; LONGITUDINAL CHROMATIC ABERRATION; OPTICAL-QUALITY DIFFERENCES; VISUAL OUTCOMES; BILATERAL IMPLANTATION; PERFORMANCE; SIZE;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e275
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: We compared the efficacy between trifocal and bifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: Through PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, we searched potentially relevant articles published from 1990 to 2018. Defocus curves, visual acuities (VAs) were measured as primary outcomes. Spectacle dependence, postoperative refraction, contrast sensitivity (CS), glare, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured as secondary outcomes. Effects were pooled using random-effects method. Results: We included 11 clinical trials, with a total of 787 eyes (395 subjects). The trifocal IOL group showed better binocular distance VA corrected with defocus levels of -0.5, -1.0, -1.5, and -2.5 diopter than the bifocal IOL group (All P <= 0.004). The trifocal IOL group showed better monocular uncorrected distance and intermediate VAs (mean difference [MD -0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; 95% confidence interval [CI), -0.07, -0.01; P= 0.006 and MD, -0.07 logMAR; 95% CI, -0.13, -0.01; P= 0.03, respectively). Postoperative refraction, glare, CS, and HOAs were not significantly different from each other. Conclusion: The overall findings indicate that trifocal diffractive IOL implantation is better than the bifocal diffractive IOL in intermediate VA, and provides similar or better in distance and near VAs without any major deterioration in the visual quality.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Quality of life related variables measured for three multifocal diffractive intraocular lenses: a prospective randomised clinical trial [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Kaymak, Hakan ;
Breyer, Detlef ;
Cochener, Beatrice ;
Plaza-Puche, Ana B. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 46 (04) :380-388
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Online Kensaku
[3]   Comparison Between Mix-and-Match Implantation of Bifocal Intraocular Lenses and Bilateral Implantation of Trifocal Intraocular Lenses [J].
Bilbao-Calabuig, Rafael ;
Gonzalez-Lopez, Felix ;
Amparo, Ferrer ;
Alvarez, Gemma ;
Patel, Sunni R. ;
Llovet-Osuna, Fernando .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 32 (10) :659-663
[4]   Light-distortion analysis as a possible indicator of visual quality after refractive lens exchange with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses [J].
Brito, Pedro ;
Salgado-Borges, Jose ;
Neves, Helena ;
Gonzalez-Meijome, Jose ;
Monteiro, Manuel .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (03) :613-622
[5]  
Calladine Daniel, 2015, Sao Paulo Med. J., V133, P68, DOI 10.1590/1516-3180.20151331T2
[6]   Visual outcomes of multifocal intraocular lens implantation in patients with cataract and high hyperopia and patient selection [J].
Cetinkaya, Servet ;
Dadaci, Zeynep ;
Acir, Nursen Oncel ;
Cetinkaya, Yasemin Fatma ;
Yener, Halil Ibrahim ;
Ozcimen, Muammer .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 8 (06) :1258-1260
[7]   ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery: Quality of vision [J].
Chiam, Patrick J. T. ;
Chan, Jin H. ;
Aggarwal, Rajesh K. ;
Kasaby, Sam .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (09) :1459-1463
[8]  
Chinn S, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P3127, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001130)19:22<3127::AID-SIM784>3.3.CO
[9]  
2-D
[10]   Prospective Clinical Comparison of Patient Outcomes Following Implantation of Trifocal or Bifocal Intraocular Lenses [J].
Cochener, Beatrice .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 32 (03) :146-+