Comparative Evaluation of Phototherapeutic Keratectomy and Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for Management of Symptomatic Chronic Bullous Keratopathy

被引:18
作者
Chawla, Bhavna [3 ]
Sharma, Namrata [3 ]
Tandon, Radhika [3 ]
Kalaivani, Mani [2 ]
Titiyal, Jeewan S. [3 ]
Vajpayee, Rasik B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Eye Res Australia, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Biostat, New Delhi, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Cornea & Refract Surg Serv, Rajendra Prasad Ctr Ophthalm Sci, New Delhi, India
关键词
symptomatic bullous keratopathy; amniotic membrane transplantation; phototherapeutic keratectomy; excimer laser; INFECTION; EYES;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ca369a
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) and amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) for symptomatic relief in painful bullous keratopathy. Methods: Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients with symptomatic bullous keratopathy and poor visual potential were randomized into 2 groups. In the PTK group (n = 13) after manual epithelial debridement, 100-mu m excimer laser ablation was performed. In the AMT group (n = 12), the corneal epithelium was scraped and cryopreserved amniotic membrane with basement membrane side up was secured with 10-0 monofilament nylon sutures. All patients were followed up for at least 6 months. Outcome parameters included symptomatic relief, time taken for surface reepithelialization, change in corneal thickness, and complications. Results: At 6-month follow-up, a significant decrease was seen in the symptom scores from the baseline level in both the PTK and AMT groups (P = 0.011 and 0.017, respectively) with no difference between the groups (P = 0.593). Complete epithelialization was noted 2 weeks postoperatively in 13 of 13 eyes in the PTK group as compared with 8 of 12 eyes in the AMT group (P = 0.023). However, this difference was not significant at the end of 3 weeks (P = 0.288). One eye in the AMT group developed Staphylococcus epidermidis keratitis. Conclusion: Both PTK and AMT are comparable in providing symptomatic relief in patients with bullous keratopathy and poor visual potential.
引用
收藏
页码:976 / 979
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Bahar, Irit ;
Kaiserman, Igor ;
McAllum, Penny ;
Slomovic, Allan ;
Rootman, David .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 115 (09) :1525-1533
[2]  
Chansanti Orathai, 2005, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V88, pS57
[3]  
CORNIER G, 1996, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V114, P654
[4]   Fungal keratitis following amniotic membrane transplantation [J].
Das S. ;
Ramamurthy B. ;
Sangwan V.S. .
International Ophthalmology, 2009, 29 (1) :49-51
[5]   The amniotic membrane in ophthalmology [J].
Dua, HS ;
Gomes, JAP ;
King, AJ ;
Maharajan, VS .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 49 (01) :51-77
[6]   Amniotic membrane transplantation for bullous keratopathy in eyes with poor visual potential [J].
Espana, EM ;
Grueterich, M ;
Sandoval, H ;
Solomon, A ;
Alfonso, E ;
Karp, CL ;
Fantes, F ;
Tseng, SCG .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (02) :279-284
[7]   Novel therapeutic approach in the management of band keratopathy using amniotic membrane transplantation with fibrin glue [J].
Esquenazi, Salomon ;
Rand, William ;
Velazquez, Gabriel ;
Grunstein, Lev .
OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2008, 39 (05) :418-421
[8]   Cryopreserved amniotic membrane transplantation for the management of symptomatic bullous keratopathy [J].
Georgiadis, Nick S. ;
Ziakas, Nikolas G. ;
Boboridis, Kostas G. ;
Terzidou, Chrysa ;
Mikropoulos, Dimitrios G. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 36 (02) :130-135
[9]   Infection after use of nonpreserved human amniotic membrane for the reconstruction of the ocular surface [J].
Khokhar, S ;
Sharma, N ;
Kumar, H ;
Soni, A .
CORNEA, 2001, 20 (07) :773-774
[10]   Combined phototherapeutic keratectomy and therapeutic contact lens for recurrent erosions in bullous keratopathy [J].
Lin, PY ;
Wu, CC ;
Lee, SM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (08) :908-911