A practical guide to methodological considerations in the controllability of structural brain networks

被引:68
|
作者
Karrer, Teresa M. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jason Z. [2 ]
Stiso, Jennifer [3 ]
Kahn, Ari E. [3 ]
Pasqualetti, Fabio [4 ]
Habel, Ute [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Bassett, Danielle S. [2 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Fac Med, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Bioengn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Dept Neurosci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Mech Engn, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[5] JARA Translat Brain Med, Aachen, Germany
[6] Res Ctr Julich, Inst Neurosci & Med, JARA Inst Brain Struct Funct Relationship INM 10, Julich, Germany
[7] Univ Penn, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Phys & Astron, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] Univ Penn, Dept Neurol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[9] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[10] Univ Penn, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Elect & Syst Engn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[11] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
network neuroscience; control theory; structural connectivity; diffusion imaging; RESTING-STATE; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; DYNAMICAL-SYSTEMS; COMPLEX; ORGANIZATION; TRACTOGRAPHY; CONNECTOME; PLASTICITY; MODELS; MOTOR;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/ab6e8b
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Predicting how the brain can be driven to specific states by means of internal or external control requires a fundamental understanding of the relationship between neural connectivity and activity. Network control theory is a powerful tool from the physical and engineering sciences that can provide insights regarding that relationship; it formalizes the study of how the dynamics of a complex system can arise from its underlying structure of interconnected units. Approach. Given the recent use of network control theory in neuroscience, it is now timely to offer a practical guide to methodological considerations in the controllability of structural brain networks. Here we provide a systematic overview of the framework, examine the impact of modeling choices on frequently studied control metrics, and suggest potentially useful theoretical extensions. We ground our discussions, numerical demonstrations, and theoretical advances in a dataset of high-resolution diffusion imaging with 730 diffusion directions acquired over approximately 1 h of scanning from ten healthy young adults. Main results. Following a didactic introduction of the theory, we probe how a selection of modeling choices affects four common statistics: average controllability, modal controllability, minimum control energy, and optimal control energy. Next, we extend the current state-of-the-art in two ways: first, by developing an alternative measure of structural connectivity that accounts for radial propagation of activity through abutting tissue, and second, by defining a complementary metric quantifying the complexity of the energy landscape of a system. We close with specific modeling recommendations and a discussion of methodological constraints. Significance. Our hope is that this accessible account will inspire the neuroimaging community to more fully exploit the potential of network control theory in tackling pressing questions in cognitive, developmental, and clinical neuroscience.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Controllability of structural brain networks
    Gu, Shi
    Pasqualetti, Fabio
    Cieslak, Matthew
    Telesford, Qawi K.
    Yu, Alfred B.
    Kahn, Ari E.
    Medaglia, John D.
    Vettel, Jean M.
    Miller, Michael B.
    Grafton, Scott T.
    Bassett, Danielle S.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 6
  • [2] The impact of input node placement in the controllability of structural brain networks
    Alizadeh Darbandi, Seyed Samie
    Fornito, Alex
    Ghasemi, Abdorasoul
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [3] Path-dependent connectivity, not modularity, consistently predicts controllability of structural brain networks
    Patankar, Shubhankar P.
    Kim, Jason Z.
    Pasqualetti, Fabio
    Bassett, Danielle S.
    NETWORK NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 4 (04): : 1091 - 1121
  • [4] Trajectory of rich club properties in structural brain networks
    Riedel, Levin
    van den Heuvel, Martijn P.
    Markett, Sebastian
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2022, 43 (14) : 4239 - 4253
  • [5] Heritability and Cognitive Relevance of Structural Brain Controllability
    Lee, Won Hee
    Rodrigue, Amanda
    Glahn, David C.
    Bassett, Danielle S.
    Frangou, Sophia
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2020, 30 (05) : 3044 - 3054
  • [6] Mapping Language Networks Using the Structural and Dynamic Brain Connectomes
    Del Gaizo, John
    Fridriksson, Julius
    Yourganov, Grigori
    Hillis, Argye E.
    Hickok, Gregory
    Misic, Bratislav
    Rorden, Chris
    Bonilha, Leonardo
    ENEURO, 2017, 4 (05)
  • [7] Indirect Structural Connectivity Identifies Changes in Brain Networks After Stroke
    Sotelo, Miguel R.
    Kalinosky, Benjamin T.
    Goodfriend, Karin
    Hyngstrom, Allison S.
    Schmit, Brian D.
    BRAIN CONNECTIVITY, 2020, 10 (08) : 399 - 410
  • [8] Topological correlations of structural and functional networks in patients with traumatic brain injury
    Caeyenberghs, Karen
    Leemans, Alexander
    Leunissen, Inge
    Michiels, Karla
    Swinnen, Stephan P.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [9] On the Structural Target Controllability of Undirected Networks
    Li, Jingqi
    Chen, Ximing
    Pequito, Sergio
    Pappas, George J.
    Preciado, Victor M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2021, 66 (10) : 4836 - 4843
  • [10] Reproducibility of graph metrics of human brain structural networks
    Duda, Jeffrey T.
    Cook, Philip A.
    Gee, James C.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2014, 8